Re: Opie and OpenEmbedded

Lorn Potter <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.handhelds.opie.devel
Organization Trolltech Pty Ltd
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On Sunday 29 October 2006 19:49, Dmitriy Korovkin wrote:
> Paul,
> I agree with you. If you would take care about OPIE packages and
> distribution it would be nice. From my site, I can take care about
> bluetooth/OBEX development (I'd like to make OBEX part do data exchange
> without external utilities, and I'd like to make OPIE device work with
> bluetooth keyboards and (probably) with BT headsets). I may also take
> care about new patches.
> In my oppinion, there are two things we are really need - the "marketing
> requirements" and testing.
> 1. Marketing requirements.
> We need a list of features we would like to see in the next release.
> Everything that is really needed will be done soon.

I think the next release should be 'Opie II' (or, Opie 4), based on the soon 
to be GPL'd Qtopia 4.

> 2. Testing.
> We need a team of users/supporters/volunteers who may test new features
> on their devices and help newcomers start using OPIE.
> I see some bad examples especially in local community like this one:
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
>--------------------------------- Newbie: - I have installed OPIE. Nothing
> works. Can someone help me. Coder: - What platform do you use? Describe
> your problem, please.
> NB: - iPAQ xxxx. The problem is simple. Nothing works.
> Coder: - Sorry, I have another model. Visit opie.handhelds.org or #opie.
> There are many guys who may help you.
> Provocator: - You see, this is the typical opsorce. Nothing works, no
> tech support. That's why I use Windows.
> .... Lame and flame ...
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
>---------------------------------- This is my view. If anyone can help to
> solve these two problems, his help would be very highly appreciated.
> Thanks,
>
> Dmitriy
>

That is a very typical response. You can always say, 'it works for me!' 

Linux and open source are mostly about being able to do it yourself. No one 
has ever stated Opie came with support. There is no business or company 
behind Opie selling or giving support for it.

We are all volunteers and do what we feel like doing. Support isn't usually 
one of the things engineers like to do. We cannot support devices we do not 
own.

Most support must come from the people that distribute our software. They have 
that responsibility to their users. They have to figure out if its a bug in 
the underlying system, or in Opie. (sometimes its difficult to figure out 
which) In turn, Opie devs have a responsibility to support the people that 
use our code - mainly the distributions.




> Paul Sokolovsky wrote:
> >Hello Michael,
> >
> >Saturday, October 14, 2006, 2:43:11 PM, you wrote:
> >>Dear Opie developers,
> >
> >[]
> >
> >>I'd like to encourage someone of the active Opie developers
> >>to take care about everything Opie (and consequently Qt/Embedded)
> >>in OpenEmbedded.
> >
> >  I followed situation around OPIE for some before your mail, and even
> >more closely after it. I know from communication on IRC that many more
> >people did. We all waited if someone with OPIE experience will respond
> >to this call, and appears that nobody did. Taking into account that
> >OPIE removal from OE is already being scheduled, and after considering
>
> _______________________________________________
>
> http://opie.handhelds.org/cgi-bin/moin.cgi/DeveloperWikiIndex
>
> Opie-devel mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://handhelds.org/mailman/listinfo/opie-devel

-- 
Lorn 'ljp' Potter
Trolltech Qtopia Community Manager
Opie Core Developer
http://qtopia.net
_______________________________________________

http://opie.handhelds.org/cgi-bin/moin.cgi/DeveloperWikiIndex

Opie-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://handhelds.org/mailman/listinfo/opie-devel
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.