Re: OT sidetracked sisters
Mike De Bruyn <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.handhelds.palm.gtd |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Brenda, I implemented that system on cards in the mid 1980's. It made loads of sense and was easy. I used colored cards to indicate the interval of the task (red=annual, blue=monthly, etc.) I got a car box and 43 pre-labled cards (Jan-Dec, 1-31). Interestingly, that was really a 43 folders system ... so there is really nothing new on the Internet ;-) I also carried a pocket pack of cards held together with a "bear clip" and that set held some reference material as well as my TO DO list. When PDAs became reasonable, I migrated to a Palm, and just used the Task feature for ... well, Tasks ;-) and the Memo feature for reference and "cards" that had lots of steps on them. I picked up the GtD idea from reading the book and because it sounded so good but ditched it as soon as I became all bogged down in the incredible overhead of contexts and such. I would note that the Sidetracked system has as little to do with GtD as 3x5 cards do. It is just putting tasks on cards. Today I use a system called AutoFocus which you can read about here: http://www.markforster.net/autofocus-system/ Some people have implemented this system for the Palm, in OneNote, on a free web application, for OmniFocus and most of the other GtD centric tools out there. I do it with a pad of paper and a small pen that live in my pocket. It has NONE of the overhead of GtD an so I don't spend my time trying to manage a system ... I spend it doing things ... which is kind of the whole point of it all. However, people over on Mark's discussion forum (there is a link to that from the above web page) have tweaked the system in so many ways as to make it as complicated as GtD, if you love complicated ;-) I myself, added tweaks to make it have some of the features of GtD that I DID like, but eventually found that the basic system was best and backed those out. I did, however, keep the idea of a few lists and use those in conjunction with the basic AutoFocus system. I hope you find a system that works for you. -- Cheers, Mike [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]