Re: Re: Does Shadow work with Leopard?
Peggy Hanton <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.handhelds.palm.shadow |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <C4D1B49A.CD26%[email protected]> |
I¹ve given up on Shadow for now. Everything seems OK on the desktop. Everything shows up just as I¹d like to see it in all 15 branches of my outline. On my Palm, I can easily filter to ³Today and past², or whatever it is, and the items I¹d like to see show up. However, they are a jumbled mess! I can¹t sort by category at all. Sorting on Priority works only within each of the 15 branches so I see Branch 1 with categories 1 5, then Branch 2 with categories 1-5. The tags are the same way. I can¹t get all the tags to sort together. Even the title sort works only within each branch. I was much better off with the Palm built in to-dos! Maybe someone knows the magic to get a reasonable list like all the 1¹s together. If so, it would save the day. But until then, Shadow seems like a lost cause for me. From: Dean Lawrence <[email protected]> Reply-To: <[email protected]> Date: Wed, 20 Aug 2008 11:05:50 -0400 To: <[email protected]> Subject: Re: [shadow-discuss] Re: Does Shadow work with Leopard? I'm running version 4.3.1 on OSX 10.5.4 without any problems. I don't use Shadow as much as I used to, but I really haven't run into any issues. Dean On Wed, Aug 20, 2008 at 9:26 AM, Bob Embry <[email protected] <mailto:rtebiz%40mac.com> > wrote: > --- In [email protected] <mailto:shadow-discuss%40yahoogroups.com> , "ojyggep" <peggyjo@...> wrote: >> >> Is anyone using Shadow with Leopard? >> > > I tried and it crashed just like it did in 10.4 > > It has never worked for me > > My inquiries have gone unanswered > > Maybe it will work for you? > > > ------------------------------------ > > Yahoo! Groups Links > > > > -- __________________________________________ Dean Lawrence, CIO/Partner Internet Data Technology 888.GET.IDT1 ext. 701 * fax: 888.438.4381 http://www.idatatech.com/ Corporate Internet Development and Marketing Specialists [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]