Re: Re: New from Datebook doesn't show all events
shovavnik <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.handhelds.palm.shadow |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
You probably already tried all these, but here are some things I definitely do often that could hypothetically affect ordering: * move appointments around in outlook, sync, then open datebk6 which resorts on startup (are these 2 sorts - outlook and palm - the same? could they interfere with each other?) * create repeating events and then mark off event instances as they occur - iirc, this creates a new event to replace the instance and changes the start date for the repeat event to the next occurrence (or something like that) * create a repeating event, mark off occurrences as above, but then change the start date of the whole repeat event to some previous date * move events around in DateBk6 and then sync twice (to ensure there are no hotsync messages, warnings, etc.) * move events around and/or create new ones in DateBk6 and in Outlook (not the same events, though!) and then sync Are event records sorted by id, date, some kind of special sequencing field, randomly? Is it possible to change the sort criteria itself (I mean for storage, not for queries)? Can a sync affect the sort order? shovavnik On Thu, Oct 16, 2008 at 4:43 PM, Jeff Mitchell <[email protected]> wrote: > On Thu, 16 Oct 2008, shovavnik wrote: > > # Of course, I don't program for the Palm, so I'm not sure what the file > # structure and allocation tables look like, and theoretically I'm not > # sure how this hypothesis explains the issue, so I could be (and probably > # am) totally off, but maybe, just maybe... > > Thatsw why I mentioned it.. its somethign in there about this; in > the header (first record) there is a hint as to the order of subsequent > records, and Shadow should be honoring it. (I say that, because I used > Palm's code for reading that database at least at some point) but > something isn't lining up. Perhaps there are newer ordering options, and > factoring in deleted records (which should be at DB end, but some adds do > not move them).. something is funky. > > the funny thing is it works most of the time for most people, big > or small DBs with various sorting orders. I've checked countless machines > :) But it does show up for a bunch of people too. > > jeff > > -- > If everyone would put barbecue sauce on their food, there would be no war. > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]