Re: Re: God Himself has set the change from Qwerty to Dvorak as His Challenge

Marcus Brooks <[email protected]> Tue, 18 Jan 2011 09:31:03 -0600
Newsgroups gmane.comp.hardware.altkeyboards
Message-ID <[email protected]>
The single best provision, and least damaging to the public's  
perception of Dvorak users, would be to remove barriers to using  
Dvorak. Particularly: employers, schools, and testing organizations  
should be required to extend reasonable accommodation to applicants  
who want to type in Dvorak.


On Jan 17, 2011, at 12:53 PM, Gregory G wrote:

> Thank you Thomas for the review. Yes. We can Dvorak.
>
> My next job is to write a bill for consideration by Congress.  And  
> I am asking for input from all members of this group.  Here is the  
> deal.  What provisions do you think are necessary in the law that  
> would make Dvorak the national standard and how should they be  
> worded.  By that I mean considerations to make sure that those who  
> now actually touch type on a qwerty don't rebel and put up a stink.
>
> Remember these facts when coming up with your suggestions.  Fewer  
> than 5% of all qwerty typists actually touch type.  How to give  
> those people enough time away from their qwerty keyboard to effect  
> maximum impact and mimimal retraining costs.  Remember the cost of  
> retraining typists was estimated to recouped in ten days.
>
> Please also forward your experience and how you found out about  
> Dvorak and what  possesd you to change.  These stories are bound to  
> affect members of Congress.
>
> I realize that there are members such as M. W. Brooks who don't  
> think mandatory switching is the best idea.  So I am asking those  
> members especially to propose components of the bill to make  
> recommendations as to how far to go as I draft the legislation.
>
> This is a grassroots movement and I am asking each and everyone of  
> you to become "Yes. We can Dvorak" ambassdors.  As such I plan on  
> having a website where you can purchase items with the "Yes. We can  
> Dvorak" slogan on them up and running by 5:00PM tonight.  You will  
> be able to find the items on the resources page at http:// 
> YesWeCanDvorak.com
>
>
> -- In [email protected], Thomas Levine  
> <thomas.levine@...> wrote:
>>
>> I checked out the website. Exciting
>>
>> "Most people who read my book Ronald Reagan Anti-Christ make a
>> committment to switch from the Qwerty keyboard to the Dvorak
>> keyboard."
>>
>> I suppose it's because of this section
>> http://www.globusz.com/ebooks/RonaldReagan/00000026.htm
>>
>> I suppose I'll have to read more of the book.
>>
>> Tom
>>
>> On Sat, Jan 15, 2011 at 7:23 PM, Gregory G <gregory@...> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> My name is Gregory GOrDon. Some of you know me for my major  
>>> dispute with MWBrooks concerning whether or not to mandate the  
>>> switch from Qwerty to Dvorak. Others may know me for my publicity  
>>> stunt when I broke into Ronald Reagan's retirement home  
>>> proclaiming myself as The Second Christ and Exposing Reagan as  
>>> the anti-Christ. Whether you believe or not is not important.  
>>> What is important is that I am launching out on a mission from  
>>> God is my own name to see to it that the American National  
>>> Standards Institute (ANSI) Replaces Dvoraks position from an  
>>> alternative keyboard to the new national standard.
>>>
>>> As we are living in a world run by sound bites and catch phrases  
>>> I have come up with a catch phrase taken right out of president  
>>> Obama's winning campaign for the presidency: "Yes. We can  
>>> Dvorak." In support of this mission I have opened a new website  
>>> at http://YesWeCanDvorak.com
>>>
>>> Please check it out. And, while you are there be sure to check  
>>> the About Me page. There you will find my story on how I became  
>>> involved with the Dvorak movement.
>>>
>>>
>>
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------
>
> To Post a message, send it to:   [email protected]
> To Unsubscribe, send a blank message to: altkeyboards- 
> [email protected]! Groups Links
>
>
>



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]