Re: [avr-chat] Re: OT: Like to recommend any other good AVR mailing lists?
[email protected] Thu, 18 Nov 2004 10:26:46 -0800 (PST)
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.hardware.avr.gcc,gmane.comp.hardware.avr.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Date: Thu, 18 Nov 2004 10:43:42 -0700 From: "E. Weddington" <[email protected]> To: Dave VanHorn <[email protected]> Subject: Re: [avr-chat] Re: [avr-gcc-list] OT: Like to recommend any other good AVR mailing lists? Well, I'm a little more sanguine about it. AVR Freaks, I feel, has it's place. There's a number of good people there. It's a good place if you have fast question. I've noticed that a number of times questions don't get answered on avr-gcc-list, or at least it seems cyclical. There are times that avr-gcc-list is very quiet and then, like recently, a huge surge in traffic. AVR Freaks is a good place for newbies; they learn the ropes. I agree the name is almost embarassing, but I didn't choose it. One other nice thing, is that, *finally*, there are people from Atmel who are answering some questions on AVR Freaks, especially in regards to their AVR Studio software. I think it's getting monitored more by Atmel. I also read the Usenet newsgroup comp.arch.embedded and Ulf Samuelsson ([email protected]) responds there. If you're not familiar with newsgroups fire up outlook express and configure it according to your internet service provider's instructions and take it for a spin.