Re: Re: [avr-gcc-list] OT: Like to recommend any other good AVR mailing lists?

[email protected] wrote:

>   Date: Thu, 18 Nov 2004 10:43:42 -0700
>   From: "E. Weddington" <[email protected]>
>   To: Dave VanHorn <[email protected]>
>   Subject: Re: [avr-chat]  Re: [avr-gcc-list] OT: Like to recommend any   other
>    good AVR mailing lists?
>
>   Well, I'm a little more sanguine about it. AVR Freaks, I feel, has it's 
>   place. There's a number of good people there. It's a good place if you 
>   have fast question. I've noticed that a number of times questions don't 
>   get answered on avr-gcc-list, or at least it seems cyclical. There are 
>   times that avr-gcc-list is very quiet and then, like recently, a huge 
>   surge in traffic. AVR Freaks is a good place for newbies; they learn the 
>   ropes. I agree the name is almost embarassing, but I didn't choose it. 
>   One other nice thing, is that, *finally*, there are people from Atmel 
>   who are answering some questions on AVR Freaks, especially in regards to 
>   their AVR Studio software. I think it's getting monitored more by Atmel.
>
>I also read the Usenet newsgroup comp.arch.embedded and Ulf Samuelsson
>([email protected]) responds there.  If you're not familiar with
>newsgroups fire up outlook express and configure it according to your
>internet service provider's instructions and take it for a spin.
>
>  
>
Yup. I've seen him there too. :-)