RE: CANOpen illegal messages
"H.J. Oertel" <[email protected]> Fri, 01 May 2015 01:09:06 +0200
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.hardware.bus.can |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
yes John, I would say so. Ignore such messages. On 30. April 2015 23:35:19 MESZ, John Dammeyer <[email protected]> wrote: >Hi David, >Thanks. Specifically I'm wondering what the official CANOpen position >is on >this. I believe a node should ignore incorrectly formed messages. >Just >wondering if it's a rule for CANOpen. >John > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: [email protected] [mailto:canlist- >> [email protected]] On Behalf Of Smith, David >> Sent: April-30-15 12:39 PM >> To: [email protected]; [email protected] >> Subject: RE: [CANLIST] CANOpen illegal messages >> >> >> The simplest approach would be to ignore an undefined yet correctly >formed >> message, (correct number of bits, good CRC, EOF, etc). >> If the concern is about system degradation due to bandwidth >consuming, >high- >> priority junk, then a communication error status could be set. >> >> Dave Smith >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: [email protected] [mailto:canlist- >> [email protected]] On Behalf Of John Dammeyer >> Sent: Thursday, April 30, 2015 1:52 PM >> To: [email protected] >> Subject: [CANLIST] CANOpen illegal messages >> >> What should a CAN module do if someone puts a message on the bus with >an >> ID=000 and DLC=0? >> Thanks >> John Dammeyer >> >> -- >> Archives and useful links: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/CANbus >> Subscribe and unsubscribe at www.vector.com/canlist/ Report any >problems >to >> <[email protected]> >> -- >> Archives and useful links: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/CANbus >> Subscribe and unsubscribe at www.vector.com/canlist/ >> Report any problems to <[email protected]> > >-- >Archives and useful links: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/CANbus >Subscribe and unsubscribe at www.vector.com/canlist/ >Report any problems to <[email protected]> -- Heinz Jürgen Oertel vom Android Handy