Single ended termination?.
"Al Thomason" <[email protected]> Mon, 8 Feb 2021 14:24:00 -0800
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.hardware.bus.can |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
------=_NextPart_000_0469_01D6FE26.0C6C6110
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=WINDOWS-1252
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
I have a question for the group: Every one of us has (and likely does) run
with a single 120 ohm terminator on the development bench; and all
references I know of in no uncertain terms disavow that practice for actual
end user deployment. But I am asking if: Does anyone know of a
creditable study / reference talking to use the use of a single 120 ohm
terminator in customer (production) deployments there the 'CAN Wiring' is
very local and Tx rates modest. =20
=20
Example, 250Kbps, 2-3 nodes over a total CAN distance of maybe 1-2m at max?
=20
Thank you,
=20
-al-
=20
=20
------=_NextPart_000_0469_01D6FE26.0C6C6110
Content-Type: text/html; charset=WINDOWS-1252
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
<html xmlns:v=3D"urn:schemas-microsoft-com:vml" xmlns:o=3D"urn:schemas-micr=
osoft-com:office:office" xmlns:w=3D"urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:word" =
xmlns:m=3D"http://schemas.microsoft.com/office/2004/12/omml" xmlns=3D"http:=
//www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40"><head><meta http-equiv=3DContent-Type content=
=3D"text/html; charset=3Dus-ascii"><meta name=3DGenerator content=3D"Micros=
oft Word 12 (filtered medium)"><style><!--
/* Font Definitions */
@font-face
=09{font-family:"Cambria Math";
=09panose-1:2 4 5 3 5 4 6 3 2 4;}
@font-face
=09{font-family:Calibri;
=09panose-1:2 15 5 2 2 2 4 3 2 4;}
/* Style Definitions */
p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal
=09{margin:0in;
=09margin-bottom:.0001pt;
=09font-size:11.0pt;
=09font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";}
a:link, span.MsoHyperlink
=09{mso-style-priority:99;
=09color:blue;
=09text-decoration:underline;}
a:visited, span.MsoHyperlinkFollowed
=09{mso-style-priority:99;
=09color:purple;
=09text-decoration:underline;}
span.EmailStyle17
=09{mso-style-type:personal-compose;
=09font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";
=09color:windowtext;}
.MsoChpDefault
=09{mso-style-type:export-only;}
@page WordSection1
=09{size:8.5in 11.0in;
=09margin:1.0in 1.0in 1.0in 1.0in;}
div.WordSection1
=09{page:WordSection1;}
--></style><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:shapedefaults v:ext=3D"edit" spidmax=3D"1026" />
</xml><![endif]--><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:shapelayout v:ext=3D"edit">
<o:idmap v:ext=3D"edit" data=3D"1" />
</o:shapelayout></xml><![endif]--></head><body lang=3DEN-US link=3Dblue vli=
nk=3Dpurple><div class=3DWordSection1><p class=3DMsoNormal>I have a questio=
n for the group: Every one of us has (and likely does) run with a sin=
gle 120 ohm terminator on the development bench; and all references I know =
of in no uncertain terms disavow that practice for actual end user deployme=
nt. But I am asking if: Does anyone know of a credi=
table study / reference talking to use the use of a single 120 ohm terminat=
or in customer (production) deployments there the ‘CAN Wiring’ =
is very local and Tx rates modest. <o:p></o:p></p><p class=3DMs=
oNormal><o:p> </o:p></p><p class=3DMsoNormal>Example, 250Kbps, 2-3 nod=
es over a total CAN distance of maybe 1-2m at max?<o:p></o:p></p><p class=
=3DMsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p><p class=3DMsoNormal>Thank you,<o:p></o:p=
></p><p class=3DMsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p><p class=3DMsoNormal>-al-<o:=
p></o:p></p><p class=3DMsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p><p class=3DMsoNormal>=
<o:p> </o:p></p></div></body></html>
------=_NextPart_000_0469_01D6FE26.0C6C6110--
--
Subscribe, unscribe, and archives at www.canlist.org - report any problems to <[email protected]>