Re: 4506 vs 4510

Merhabalar.

4506'lar=C4=B1n backplain kapasitesi d=C3=BC=C5=9F=C3=BCk oldu=C4=9Fu i=C3=
=A7in 6506 al=C4=B1p VSS yapm=C4=B1=C5=9Ft=C4=B1k.
Ancak 4510 kasas=C4=B1n=C4=B1 bilmiyorum. =C3=A7ift s=C3=BCpevizorlu ise te=
rcih edebilirsin
asl=C4=B1nda, Risk durumunda kasan=C4=B1n ar=C4=B1za yapmayaca=C4=9F=C4=B1 =
varsayarsan.

Sayg=C4=B1lar=C4=B1mla
Serdar.

14 Ekim 2011 09:49 tarihinde Emre Ogmen <[email protected]> yazd=C4=B1:

> **
>
>
> Merhaba,
>
> Bir tasar=C4=B1 i=C3=A7in yard=C4=B1ma ihtiyac=C4=B1m var. 2 model =C3=BC=
zerinde d=C3=BC=C5=9F=C3=BCn=C3=BCyoruz ve
> sizlere dan=C4=B1=C5=9Fmak istedim. 2 tane 4506 al=C4=B1p bunlar=C4=B1 or=
tak =C3=A7al=C4=B1=C5=9Ft=C4=B1r=C4=B1p
> redundant bir yap=C4=B1 m=C4=B1 olu=C5=9Fturmak daha iyi yoksa 1 tane 451=
0 alarak m=C4=B1 =C3=A7=C3=B6zmek
> daha iyi? redundant superviser kullan=C4=B1lacak 4510 da fakat yap=C4=B1 =
olarak
> hangisi daha sa=C4=9Fl=C4=B1kl=C4=B1 olur?
>
> Te=C5=9Fekk=C3=BCrler
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
>=20=20
>


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



------------------------------------

--
Cisco Teknik Tartisma Listesi (Cisco-ttl)

Disclaimer: Some of the individuals posting to this site, including=20
the moderators, work for Cisco Systems, Inc. Opinions expressed here and in=
 any corresponding comments are the personal opinions of the original autho=
rs, not those of Cisco.
 Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/cisco-ttl/

<*> Your email settings:
    Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/cisco-ttl/join
    (Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
    [email protected]=20
    [email protected]

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [email protected]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/