Re: 4506 vs 4510
Ersin Erdogan <[email protected]> Fri, 14 Oct 2011 17:56:02 +0300
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.hardware.cisco.turkish |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
=C4=B0kisi de trafik kapasitesi olarak su anda ve =C3=B6ng=C3=B6rd=C3=BC=C4= =9F=C3=BCn trafik art=C4=B1s=C4=B1na g=C3=B6re y=C4=B1llar baz=C4=B1nda iht= iyac=C4=B1n=C4=B1 kar=C5=9F=C4=B1l=C4=B1yorsa =C3=A7ift almakta fayda oldug= unu d=C3=BC=C5=9F=C3=BCn=C3=BCyorum. On 14 Eki 2011, at 09:49, Emre Ogmen <[email protected]> wrote: > Merhaba, >=20 > Bir tasar=C4=B1 i=C3=A7in yard=C4=B1ma ihtiyac=C4=B1m var. 2 model =C3=BC= zerinde d=C3=BC=C5=9F=C3=BCn=C3=BCyoruz ve sizlere dan=C4=B1=C5=9Fmak isted= im. 2 tane 4506 al=C4=B1p bunlar=C4=B1 ortak =C3=A7al=C4=B1=C5=9Ft=C4=B1r= =C4=B1p redundant bir yap=C4=B1 m=C4=B1 olu=C5=9Fturmak daha iyi yoksa 1 ta= ne 4510 alarak m=C4=B1 =C3=A7=C3=B6zmek daha iyi? redundant superviser kull= an=C4=B1lacak 4510 da fakat yap=C4=B1 olarak hangisi daha sa=C4=9Fl=C4=B1kl= =C4=B1 olur?=20 >=20 > Te=C5=9Fekk=C3=BCrler >=20 > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] >=20 >=20 [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] ------------------------------------ -- Cisco Teknik Tartisma Listesi (Cisco-ttl) Disclaimer: Some of the individuals posting to this site, including=20 the moderators, work for Cisco Systems, Inc. Opinions expressed here and in= any corresponding comments are the personal opinions of the original autho= rs, not those of Cisco. Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/cisco-ttl/ <*> Your email settings: Individual Email | Traditional <*> To change settings online go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/cisco-ttl/join (Yahoo! ID required) <*> To change settings via email: [email protected]=20 [email protected] <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [email protected] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/