Re: [EE] PCB Manufacturers.

David Robertson <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.hardware.microcontrollers.pic
Message-ID <CACyjwT0EL_EJsAaErzeJfgn=VGCmfHxS5Z7BTp5K5AMfRAv=4g@mail.gmail.com>
>  I'd be interested in hearing more about pcbway and faked reports.

I ordered some prototype panels from pcbway using the advanced PCB service
(custom stackup). At first I was quite happy with how they dealt with the
order, and they provided an inspection report + the physical microsection
sample and impedance test coupon with the order. Everything looked great.

Then a while later, we needed more samples of the same board for further
testing. There were no design changes at all, I just reordered the same
design. They provided a new final inspection report + samples, with the new
order date on it.

On comparison of the reports, it was immediately obvious that they had
simply copy-pasted the report contents and changed the date on every page.

The main giveaway is the page about the microsectional analysis, where they
have measured various layer/plating thicknesses under the microscope and
given the measurements with a resolution of 0.01um. I don't think that is a
realistic measurement precision, but I can ignore that. What I can't ignore
is that the measurements were all exactly identical between the two
reports. Clearly, they did not actually re-measure the new samples.

Similarly the controlled impedance measurements were given to 0.01ohm
resolution, and yet the numbers matched exactly. I don't think it's
realistically achievable for two samples from different lots months apart
to measure absolutely identically at that resolution. They clearly didn't
measure it again.

To me, reissuing a report like that with the new order number/date on it
but copy/pasted data is a deliberate attempt to deceive. I need to be able
to trust vendors not to lie to me, so they did not get the production order.

David


On Sun, 23 Feb 2025 at 19:30, Alan Pearce <[email protected]>
wrote:

> Me too, I was wondering what and how you discovered whatever the problem
> was, and how you managed to call them out on it.
>
>
>
> On Sun, 23 Feb 2025 at 22:31, David VanHorn <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > I'd be interested in hearing more about pcbway and faked reports.
> >
> > On Sat, Feb 22, 2025, 5:47 PM David Robertson <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > > At work, I decided not to use PCBWay again after I caught them
> > fabricating
> > > inspection report data. For hobby projects you might not care, but for
> me
> > > it just means I don't trust them any more.
> > >
> > > David
> > >
> > > On Sat, 22 Feb 2025 at 19:38, David VanHorn <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> > >
> > > > PCBway here.
> > > >
> > > > Also FWIW Kicad 9.0 is out, and their OBD output is working nicely.
> > > >
> > > > On Sat, Feb 22, 2025 at 4:34 PM Allen Mulvey <[email protected]>
> > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > I have been using JLCPCB for the last few years. KiCAD has a plugin
> > for
> > > > > them also. Here in the USA they have the usual FedEx, DHL, and UPS
> > but
> > > > > they also have Global Standard Direct Line which is very cheap
> (about
> > > > > $1.50) but it takes about a week and a half to get to Rome, NY,
> USA.
> > > > > This was recently added, in last year or so. With DHL I can order
> on
> > > > > Monday and have them on Friday.
> > > > >
> > > > > Allen Mulvey
> > > > >
> > > > > On 2/22/2025 4:57 PM, Dwayne Reid wrote:
> > > > > > Hi there, David.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I'm in Canada - my results may not jive with where you are.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > We currently use:
> > > > > > JLCPCB
> > > > > > KINGCREDIE
> > > > > >
> > > > > > JLCPCB gets by far the majority of our work.  But Linda at
> > KingCredie
> > > > > > is a joy to work with and I still do all of the flex circuit
> boards
> > > we
> > > > > > build with them.  They are somewhat more expensive than JLCPCB
> but
> > > the
> > > > > > help Linda have give to us in the past has to count for
> something.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > JLCPCB offers several different ship options: DHL, UPS, FedEx.
> > FedEx
> > > > > > is alway the most expensive, so we don't use them.  DHL and UPS
> > seem
> > > > > > to see-saw back and forth as to who has the better ship price.  I
> > > just
> > > > > > go with whoever is the least expensive at the time of order.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Be aware that ordering a SMT stencil results in two packages.
> This
> > > > > > approximately doubles the cost of shipping as compared to just
> > > getting
> > > > > > the bare boards.  But the stencils are always perfect and it is
> far
> > > > > > simpler to just accept the extra cost of shipping.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I used to send RFQ's to several dozen different PCB suppliers.  I
> > > quit
> > > > > > doing that when I found that I was mostly ordering from JLCPCB.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > It looks like you are in the UK.  Maybe check out PCBWay.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Also - maybe check out the current version of KiCAD for your
> > layouts
> > > > > > and schematics.  Although I have dabbled with it, I still stay
> with
> > > my
> > > > > > old standbys: EE Designer II and CADint.  But I would be all over
> > > > > > KiCAD if I wasn't so heavily invested in my current tools.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > dwayne
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > At 10:56 AM 2/22/2025, David C Brown wrote:
> > > > > >> I know that this has been done to death but there might be new
> > > > > >> ibformation.
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> Since retiring I have been building circuits on stripboard which
> > is
> > > > > >> never
> > > > > >> very satisfactory.
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> So I have resurrected the copy of PROTEL which fell into my
> > > cardboard
> > > > > >> box
> > > > > >> when I required and designed proper circuit boards.  It is
> > > convenient
> > > > > >> that
> > > > > >> the schematic editor, Tinycad, can output Protel nelists.
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> Now I need a cheap manufacturer.  In the first instance I will
> put
> > > > price
> > > > > >> above quality since, in my experience,  first attempts usually
> > > > > >> contain some
> > > > > >> flaw that necessitates a redesign..
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> Also can anyone recommend a free Gerber viewer now that
> GCPreview
> > is
> > > > no
> > > > > >> longer free?
> > > > > >> __________________________________________
> > > > > >> David C Brown
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > --
> > > > > http://www.piclist.com/techref/piclist PIC/SX FAQ & list archive
> > > > > View/change your membership options at
> > > > > https://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist
> > > > >
> > > > --
> > > > http://www.piclist.com/techref/piclist PIC/SX FAQ & list archive
> > > > View/change your membership options at
> > > > https://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist
> > > >
> > > --
> > > http://www.piclist.com/techref/piclist PIC/SX FAQ & list archive
> > > View/change your membership options at
> > > https://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist
> > >
> > --
> > http://www.piclist.com/techref/piclist PIC/SX FAQ & list archive
> > View/change your membership options at
> > https://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist
> >
> --
> http://www.piclist.com/techref/piclist PIC/SX FAQ & list archive
> View/change your membership options at
> https://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist
>
-- 
http://www.piclist.com/techref/piclist PIC/SX FAQ & list archive
View/change your membership options at
https://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.