Re: [Ee] Field mill

David VanHorn <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.hardware.microcontrollers.pic
Message-ID <CAB115wGLJVdLCE3PNQpirv7hc1EZm6e-FpQMrtjk9AL8Gd+Q3A@mail.gmail.com>
Finally found a good youtube on this:  The Weather Channel, Sky on Fire.
It doesnt go into much detail on the rocket facility though.



On Tue, Jun 10, 2025, 4:21 AM David VanHorn <[email protected]> wrote:

> Well, I finally found the odd duck I was looking for.  Pasco scientific,
> PS-3211
>
> It has a 30V bipolar range and communicates by bluetooth by phone app.
>
> About $40 on ebay.
>
>
> On Sat, Jun 7, 2025, 3:56 PM David VanHorn <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> " As a hypothetical, if you lay a 100ft pair of 24AWG wires with 300V
>> insulation on the ground, and lightning strikes one end, what potential
>> appears on the other end? The potential is with respect to what? And for
>> how long does the potential exist? Is it likely and/or possible and/or
>> desirable for the wire to survive a direct strike at one end of the cable?"
>>
>> The potential that matters is what ends up across me or my vehicle, or my
>> equipment.  It lasts some milliseconds.  It's not likely that the field
>> mill or the wire would survive a direct hit.  20 to 50 kA does interesting
>> things.
>> The old trueism that lightning never strikes the same place twice isn't
>> really true, but frequently it's somewhat true as "the same place" isn't
>> there anymore. :)
>>
>> I'd urge you to read up on Charles Steinmentz and everything by Martin
>> Uman.
>> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Martin_A._Uman
>>
>> That copper wire MAY perf it's insulation near the tripod and leave me
>> with only a few hundred volts, or it may become a plasma channel with
>> resistance of a few ohms leading the bulk of the strike directly to me.
>> I'm not willing to risk a copper path that leads directly to me.   Even
>> if only a few hundred volts, it could easily be lethal. It will be rather
>> humid, and I may well be very wet.
>> I will also be FAR from any medical support. Heart goes into Vfib and I'm
>> done.
>>
>>
>> On Sat, Jun 7, 2025 at 4:02 AM Jason White <
>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>> I used to design direct lightning strike circuit protection networks for
>>> avionics - so I might be biased.
>>>
>>> You probably already possess about a dozen ways of getting a reading to
>>> you
>>> safely with stuff you have just laying around.
>>>
>>> As a hypothetical, if you lay a 100ft pair of 24AWG wires with 300V
>>> insulation on the ground, and lightning strikes one end, what potential
>>> appears on the other end? The potential is with respect to what? And for
>>> how long does the potential exist? Is it likely and/or possible and/or
>>> desirable for the wire to survive a direct strike at one end of the
>>> cable?
>>>
>>> Suppose the end of the cable was attached to an indicator: a $5 meter, or
>>> LED sting, or whatever. What would it take to render said indicator safe
>>> to
>>> stand next to and look at? Is it possible for the indicator to be usable
>>> without ever touching it? Is it likely and/or possible and/or desirable
>>> for
>>> the indicator to survive a direct strike at one end of the cable?
>>>
>>> I can speculate, but I'd like to hear what you and others think.
>>>
>>> I'm genuinely curious about the answers. My intuition tells me one thing,
>>> but maybe I could be wrong.
>>> --
>>> http://www.piclist.com/techref/piclist PIC/SX FAQ & list archive
>>> View/change your membership options at
>>> https://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist
>>>
>>
-- 
http://www.piclist.com/techref/piclist PIC/SX FAQ & list archive
View/change your membership options at
https://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.