Re: [EE] looking for negative 5V regulator or circuit
doug metzler <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.hardware.microcontrollers.pic |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CANYzFNhrErfhaZUknZA9B0_JgywcXg=KNmCSJ2oS5oNxhQ9jCw@mail.gmail.com> |
TL;DR but I have one of these sitting right in front of me. https://www.digikey.com/en/products/detail/digilent-inc/410-294-A/5730865?s=N4IgjCBcpgrATANiqAxlAZgQwDYGcBTAGhAHsoBtEeAFgE4wB2eEAXRIAcAXKEAZS4AnAJYA7AOYgAvlJItIVACbDxwnAVFcABB1IB3AoIBGI1AGstbKUA but maybe that exceeds your "not stupid expensive" requirement :-) On Thu, Jun 12, 2025 at 12:18 PM Isaac Marino Bavaresco < [email protected]> wrote: > If the OP needs several of such circuits, the number of components grow > rapidly. > > With his original idea, a few components can be saved for each circuit. > > Cheers, > > Isaac > > > > Em 12/06/2025 11:03, Dmitriy Kiryashov escreveu: > > Hi Dwayne. > > > > If you goal is to switch hi-side ( +12V ) on and off to some load ( in > reference to the ground ) > > why don't you try pair P-FET on high side ( instead of PNP ) and N-FET > to ground controlling > > that P-FET ( plus few resistors ). > > > > What is benefit of creating that artifical "-5 below incoming +12" level > instead of doing control > > in reference to the ground ? > > > > > > Dmitriy. > > On Wednesday, June 11, 2025 at 09:37:44 AM PDT, Dwayne Reid < > [email protected]> wrote: > > > > I see that I was not sufficiently clear about what I am doing. My > > apologies. > > > > I am doing hi-side switching from the incoming +12 Vdc supply. It looks > > like the easiest and least expensive way to do this is to use 74HC595 > shift > > registers driving MMBT4403 transistors. THe emitters of the transistors > > are tied to the incoming +12V rail. So are the VDD pins of the shift > > register and the PIC that is driving the shift register. > > > > So - I need to create a -5V rail with respect to that +12V rail. In > other > > words, about 7 Vdc. My initial thought was to use a 7905B regulator with > > its input tied to incoming ground and the bias pin tied to the +12V rail. > > That gives me -5 Vdc with respect to the incoming +12V rail. The > problem I > > have is that the 7905 data sheet says that worst case bias current is 8 > mA > > which is really high for a vehicle that might be sitting idle (turned > OFF) > > for weeks on end. > > > > So - I'm looking for a -5 Vdc regulator that has significantly-lower > > quiescent current than the 7905. My fall-back position is something > like a > > MPSA63 voltage-follower being fed with a 6.2V Zener or, as was suggested > > here, one of the low-current TL431 variants. I would use something a bit > > beefier than the MPSa63 but you get the idea. I'm wanting to get the > > quiescent current down to a couple of hundred uA. > > > > I estimate the total current on that -5V supply is less than 50 mA, > > depending on how many shift register / transistor stages I need. Might > be > > as many as 16 outputs, each transistor getting a bit more than 2 mA > drive. > > > > As always, suggestions and comments gratefully accepted! > > > > dwayne > > > > On Tue, Jun 10, 2025 at 12:43 PM Dwayne Reid <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > >> Good day to all. > >> > >> I'm working on a project where I need a negative 5 Vdc rail relative to > >> the incoming +12 Vdc rail. My first thought was a bog-standard 7905B > >> regulator (the "B" suffix denotes -40C operation) but this is a > >> battery-powered system and the worst case bias current of 8mA is way too > >> high. > >> > >> I spent some time looking at Digikey offerings but they all seem stupid > >> expensive. Can anyone suggest a part that is reasonably inexpensive and > >> works down to -40C? Current is fairly low - should be less than 20 mA > >> worst case. I sort of prefer a package larger than SOT-23 just because > of > >> the fairly minimal heat dissipated. > >> > >> My alternative is a 6.2V Zener diode feeding a PNP Darlington pass > >> transistor. > >> > >> Suggestions and opinions greatly appreciated! > >> > >> dwayne > >> > > -- > O software antivírus Avast realizou uma checagem de vírus neste e-mail. > www.avast.com > -- > http://www.piclist.com/techref/piclist PIC/SX FAQ & list archive > View/change your membership options at > https://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist > -- http://www.piclist.com/techref/piclist PIC/SX FAQ & list archive View/change your membership options at https://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist