Re: [EE] PCB design
Spehro Pefhany <[email protected]> Wed, 23 Jul 2025 13:45:26 -0400
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.hardware.microcontrollers.pic |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
At 01:16 PM 2025-07-23, you wrote: >I did a lot of PCB design before retirement mainly on multilayer boards: >4 to 12 layers. >I am now as a hobby designing two layer boards. My approach is to put as >many tracks as possible on one side of the board (fairly easy as I am >generally translating circuits that were tested on stripboard) and putting >a ground plane on the other side. > >My query is: is it better to have the ground plane on the top (component >side and the tracks on the bottom? Or vice versa? and why? If you're using modern parts (aka SMT) you're going to want to route as much as possible like a single-sided board layout on the component side. As such, placement is very important, comparatively. I found my single-sided board layout skills experienced a welcom revival when SMT became just about mandatory. Then you can put a relatively good ground plane on the other side. If you find it too taxing for a hobby, some Chinese suppliers have 4-layer boards at very reasonable prices. Then you can have one layer for a ground plane, perhaps split another layer for different Vdd domains and two layers for routing. Of course you don't get blind/buried vias, microvias or any of that fancy stuff for the low price. 4-layer, especially with aggressively small vias and track width/spacing is a snap to lay out unless you're really crowding stuff, and it's much, much better for EMC. Best regards, Spehro Pefhany