Re: MPC555 speed versus PentiumMMX
"mworksjjf" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.hardware.motorola.microcontrollers |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Hi Seth, --- In [email protected], "surgevw" <surgevw@y...> wrote: > When I got the sales pitch from Mathworks of Natick, they didn't know. > At that point they didn't understand what I was trying to do (nor did > I, exactly). When I get the model done, I will get an eval version and > try it. Ok, sounds good. > I can tell you right now that the integral term in a PID > controller eats clock cycles on the Pentium, and I am not sure why. Is your model running with discrete or continuous time? Continuous time imposes significant overhead on the real-time system. Thanks, Jon. > I > am curious to see how a 56MHz MPC565 compares with the more > conventional Simulink model and the SimMechanics inverse kinematics model. > > Thanks, > > Seth > > > --- In [email protected], "mworksjjf" <jfielder@m...> wrote: > > Hi Seth, > > > > > I trying to get a handle on the relative > > > performance of a MPC 555 or 565 > > > > You should be able to clock the MPC565 faster than the MPC555 - up to > > 56 MHz. > > > > > with respect to an early Pentium, > > > specifically a 266 MMX unit with 66MHz FSB. > > > > We're not sure exactly how these will compare for your application. > > > > Please contact your local MathWorks office and request an evaluation > > of the Embedded Target for Motorola MPC555. It is a straight > > forward process to re-target your model from xPC to MPC555. > > > > If required, your local MathWorks office will be able to get in touch > > with the development team to determine if any further optimisations > > can be applied. > > > > Best regards, > > > > Jon Fielder > > Embedded Targets Development > > The MathWorks Ltd. ------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor --------------------~--> <font face=arial size=-1><a href="http://us.ard.yahoo.com/SIG=12hg59lg0/M=362335.6886445.7839731.1510227/D=groups/S=1706554205:TM/Y=YAHOO/EXP=1123152814/A=2894361/R=0/SIG=13jmebhbo/*http://www.networkforgood.org/topics/education/digitaldivide/?source=YAHOO&cmpgn=GRP&RTP=http://groups.yahoo.com/">In low income neighborhoods, 84% do not own computers. At Network for Good, help bridge the Digital Divide!</a>.</font> --------------------------------------------------------------------~-> ----------------------------------------------------------- To learn more about Freescale Microcontrollers, please visit http://www.freescale.com/mcu Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/MPC500/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [email protected] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/