Re: XDP v DP mirrors
Douglas Siggins <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.hardware.netapp |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CAPJgcARm+OA0DxzOeDvrgkR9uMdWFnC43OH8Zf19iUhJjBmuBQ@mail.gmail.com> |
Greetings, I'd heard rumors of issues in high file count environments -- the recommendation was not to go there yet. Does anyone have more information about this? On Thu, Apr 11, 2019 at 2:05 PM Tim McCarthy <[email protected]> wrote: > Xdp is more of a logical copy and dp is physical > > Typing errors courtesy of GBoard > > Tim McCarthy, Principal Consultant > > Proud Member of the NetApp ATeam > > ------------------------------ > *From:* S. Eno <[email protected]> > *Sent:* Thursday, April 11, 2019 1:46 PM > *To:* Tim McCarthy > *Cc:* John Clear; [email protected] > *Subject:* Re: XDP v DP mirrors > > Thanks for the feedback! Aside from universal ONTAP version support, are > there any other upsides to using XDP? Depending upon which NetApp rep I > ask I get differing answers on whether XDP is file-level copy or > block-level. > > But again, thank you for the answers! > > On Apr 11, 2019, at 1:32 PM, Tim McCarthy <[email protected]> wrote: > > You should notice less performance impact on the source and as little bit > more on the destination. After the update transfer there are some > housekeeping steps that post process on the destination which uses > resources. > > Typing errors courtesy of GBoard > > Tim McCarthy, Principal Consultant > > Proud Member of the NetApp ATeam > > ------------------------------ > *From:* [email protected] on behalf of John Clear < > [email protected]> > *Sent:* Thursday, April 11, 2019 1:19 PM > *To:* S. Eno > *Cc:* [email protected] > *Subject:* Re: XDP v DP mirrors > > On Thu, Apr 11, 2019 at 01:56:05PM +0100, S. Eno via Toasters wrote: > > > > Has anyone seen benefits to using XDP mirrors? Faster? Slower? > > Better or worse network compression? > > We've converted all our snapmirrors to XDP. It is slighltly slower > but the benefit of not having to worry about source/destination > versions is worth it for us since we have a bunch of clusters cross > mirroring different volumes and with DP we had to upgrade a dozen > clusters at the same in order to not break snapmirror. > > John > _______________________________________________ > Toasters mailing list > [email protected] > http://www.teaparty.net/mailman/listinfo/toasters > > _______________________________________________ > Toasters mailing list > [email protected] > http://www.teaparty.net/mailman/listinfo/toasters > _______________________________________________ Toasters mailing list [email protected] http://www.teaparty.net/mailman/listinfo/toasters