Re: XDP v DP mirrors
tmac <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.hardware.netapp |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CAL9X-_E3uTeZfBkwdNQbHO5kAgGL93j8E-vkkZnxVP7Pxaaqmg@mail.gmail.com> |
well, considering DP was deprecated in 9.3 for regular mirrors and then in 9.5 for SVM-DR, not sure how much longer DP will be around. --tmac *Tim McCarthy, **Principal Consultant* *Proud Member of the #NetAppATeam <https://twitter.com/NetAppATeam>* *I Blog at TMACsRack <https://tmacsrack.wordpress.com/>* On Thu, Apr 11, 2019 at 4:23 PM Douglas Siggins <[email protected]> wrote: > Greetings, > > I'd heard rumors of issues in high file count environments -- the > recommendation was not to go there yet. Does anyone have more information > about this? > > On Thu, Apr 11, 2019 at 2:05 PM Tim McCarthy <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Xdp is more of a logical copy and dp is physical >> >> Typing errors courtesy of GBoard >> >> Tim McCarthy, Principal Consultant >> >> Proud Member of the NetApp ATeam >> >> ------------------------------ >> *From:* S. Eno <[email protected]> >> *Sent:* Thursday, April 11, 2019 1:46 PM >> *To:* Tim McCarthy >> *Cc:* John Clear; [email protected] >> *Subject:* Re: XDP v DP mirrors >> >> Thanks for the feedback! Aside from universal ONTAP version support, are >> there any other upsides to using XDP? Depending upon which NetApp rep I >> ask I get differing answers on whether XDP is file-level copy or >> block-level. >> >> But again, thank you for the answers! >> >> On Apr 11, 2019, at 1:32 PM, Tim McCarthy <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> You should notice less performance impact on the source and as little bit >> more on the destination. After the update transfer there are some >> housekeeping steps that post process on the destination which uses >> resources. >> >> Typing errors courtesy of GBoard >> >> Tim McCarthy, Principal Consultant >> >> Proud Member of the NetApp ATeam >> >> ------------------------------ >> *From:* [email protected] on behalf of John Clear < >> [email protected]> >> *Sent:* Thursday, April 11, 2019 1:19 PM >> *To:* S. Eno >> *Cc:* [email protected] >> *Subject:* Re: XDP v DP mirrors >> >> On Thu, Apr 11, 2019 at 01:56:05PM +0100, S. Eno via Toasters wrote: >> > >> > Has anyone seen benefits to using XDP mirrors? Faster? Slower? >> > Better or worse network compression? >> >> We've converted all our snapmirrors to XDP. It is slighltly slower >> but the benefit of not having to worry about source/destination >> versions is worth it for us since we have a bunch of clusters cross >> mirroring different volumes and with DP we had to upgrade a dozen >> clusters at the same in order to not break snapmirror. >> >> John >> _______________________________________________ >> Toasters mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://www.teaparty.net/mailman/listinfo/toasters >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Toasters mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://www.teaparty.net/mailman/listinfo/toasters >> > _______________________________________________ Toasters mailing list [email protected] http://www.teaparty.net/mailman/listinfo/toasters