Re: cheaper, slower alternative to NG?
Jim Fridlund <[email protected]> Mon, 31 Jan 2005 22:27:59 -0800 (PST)
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.hardware.openbrick.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Hi all. I've retired my OB classic and am using a WRAP 1.c board. This is based on National Geode processor (now AMD). It has 3 10/100 PCI ethernet and a miniPCI slot. I installed a miniPCI wireless card so it does both wired and wireless. It's great for SOHO. It has 64M of memory and has a compact flash IDE. I'm running my own version uClibc/Linux on it which runs off a ramdisk. It's really a nice platform with true embedded BIOS. Of course, if you want a tiny PC, the OpenBrick or boxes built based on via embedded x86 boards are good alternatives. Check out: http://www.pcengines.ch/ -- Jim --- Jean-Paul Smets <[email protected]> wrote: > Le Lundi 31 Janvier 2005 09:19, Niall Young a écrit > : > > Hi guys, > > > > Is anyone aware of a dual-NIC, cheaper alternative > to the OpenBrick NG? > > I'm after something with a minimum of x86 > processing power, something > > along the lines of a p100 or p200 with a price tag > to match. Fully > > built system, chassis, fanless if possible. Any > suggestions? > > > > eBox is one solution > > > Also - is anyone maintaining openbrick.org? It is > very out of date with > > respect to the NG and news updates. > > > > I am considering providing a Wiki site for OpenBrick > NG because it is easier > to maintain. Would that be OK ? > > JPS. > > > -- > > Niall Young > > [email protected] __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? The all-new My Yahoo! - What will yours do? http://my.yahoo.com