Re: Re: Hello, I must be going . . .
"jose inacio serafini [email protected] [msp430]" <[email protected]> Thu, 4 Sep 2014 15:03:17 -0300
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.hardware.texas-instruments.msp430.discuss |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CAJ7PqFNB6ncJ++kG+_CE908L5Ch5esQzN8e13BDydo=rs3Jf3A@mail.gmail.com> |
KFalconer Take a look at Energia: http://energia.nu Cheers J.I.Serafini 2014-09-04 11:40 GMT-03:00 [email protected] [msp430] < [email protected]>: > > > I think this is very fascinating. I am just starting a class which uses > the MSP430 (Physics 324 - Instrumental/Computer Interfacing) and was > wondering why we are learning this microcontroller over the Arduino. > > I use a Mac, and I have been exposed to the various projects (hardware and > software) on the Arduino platform, so I would have liked to use that > instead. Just as the Arduino is easy to learn and make modular as a > hardware platform, the MSP430 is powerful in being low-power and useful as > an educational/demonstration tool for showing how a microcontroller works. > > However, I'm also wondering if someone has not already tried to make the > MSP430 more like the Arduino in the sense of making it more general > purpose, i.e.: masking the hardware complexities and removing the reliance > on the Windows-based IDE. > > Is there anything in particular about the MSP430 which would make this > impossible? I am just barely scraping the surface of the MSP430, but as a > Computer Science major, I imagine that it might be as simple ("simple" used > very loosely) as extending the TI C++ libraries and headers in order to > extend functionality. > > >