Re: [Fwd: Re: [AT] Help configuring AT with XP and Crossover Cable]
Chris Dickens <[email protected]> Wed, 23 Feb 2005 09:40:30 -0500
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.hardware.voyetra.audiotron |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <000701c519b5$9fc17d40$6d010a0a@IRONHIDE> |
Tim:
Skip the second NIC like Tim says. Configure it like this:
[Internet] <--> [Company Router] <--> [Your Router]
| |
[PC] [AT]
Set your PC and AT for DHCP and the router for the same and you should be
golden.
--Chris
-----Original Message-----
Date: Tue, 22 Feb 2005 21:51:02 -0500
From: Tim Carlson <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [Fwd: Re: [AT] Help configuring AT with XP and Crossover Cable]
Yeah, the whole thing started because the router I'm on belongs to the
company, and I want to take the AT off of it. I thought this would be a
simple thing to do.
Yes, everything works fine if I plug both the PC and the AT into the router.
Thanks for all the help.
-Tim
On Tue, 22 Feb 2005 13:22:21 -0800, Tim Hill <[email protected]> wrote:
>Unlikely to be a cable issue since you can access the internet and
>ping. I'm curious... if you connect the AT to NIC #1 can you access the
>shares?
>
>I'm also trying to recall the reason for not having the AT on the NIC1
>LAN segment? If you've prepared to get another cheap router (and that
>might be the best way) I would ditch the whole second NIC thing and
>place you PC and the AT the other side of the router.
>
>--Tim
>
>Tim Carlson wrote:
>
>>Yes, I'm trying to get the AT off of the router. So, I plug my NIC#1
>>into the router which is connected to the Internet, then the AT plugs
>>into NIC#2. In order for the AT to access Turtle Radio, I have to
>>share the connection that is established via NIC#1, at least that's my
>>understanding. If there's another way to do that, then let me know.
>>
>>What I'm thinking about trying is:
>>
>>
>> AT<----->new cheap router<------->XP(NIC2)
>> |
>> |
>> XP(NIC1)<---->router<--
>Internet
>>
>>I'll keep the "new cheap router" off of the Internet if I can and try
>>sharing the Internet connection established by NIC1. If I can't, then
I'll
>>get another IP address, and run two separate systems.
>>
>>Any suggestions for the "new cheap router"?
>>
>>Also, as a last ditch effort on the Xover cable method, I was
>>wondering
if
>>it was a duplex issue? It seems that I read somewhere that the AT
operates
>>at half duplex. I haven't checked the NIC2 card, but maybe it's set at
>>full and maybe that's the issue.
>>
>>-Tim