Re: Open letter to Seth & TB (was Re: [AT] Reminder about this forum.)
Higuero Alvaro <[email protected]> Mon, 7 Mar 2005 10:28:37 -0600
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.hardware.voyetra.audiotron |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <61FEBBE06EF05A40905F0188C7735C320153B3DA@usdembx01.tp1.ad1.tetrapak.com> |
Seth, any latest news on the AT then? I saw a questions form somebody on this list, asking if the TB is still working on firmware updates, etc. for the AT. As the AT gone completely dead (meaning not even firmware updates in the foreseeable future)? Brgds Alvaro -----Original Message----- From: Turtle Beach Audiotron User Forum [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Seth Dotterer Sent: Monday, March 07, 2005 10:24 To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [AT] Open letter to Seth & TB (was Re: [AT] Reminder about this forum.) Yes, Arnt. You're correct there. Perhaps 'similar' would be better than 'competing' - but I'm pretty sure that the people on this list have been clear on what I'm asking for.=20 -----Original Message----- From: Turtle Beach Audiotron User Forum [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Arnt Gulbrandsen Sent: Monday, March 07, 2005 11:21 AM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: Open letter to Seth & TB (was Re: [AT] Reminder about this forum.) Jess Askey writes: > I have been on this list for over two years and I have to agree with=20 > Michael. Is this really a competing product? I think not. Perhaps what Seth really means is <any similar product>. We've discussed amplifiers, loudspeakers, NASes, D/A converters, and Seth hasn't protested. But he's protested every time we've touched on MP3 players from other vendors, no matter whether it's in the same market segment or not. That doesn't quite chime with my understanding of <competing>, but it does make sense... Seth, am I right? Arnt