Re: Open letter to Seth & TB (was Re: [AT] Reminder about this forum.)

Higuero Alvaro <[email protected]> Mon, 7 Mar 2005 10:28:37 -0600
Newsgroups gmane.comp.hardware.voyetra.audiotron
Message-ID <61FEBBE06EF05A40905F0188C7735C320153B3DA@usdembx01.tp1.ad1.tetrapak.com>
Seth, any latest news on the AT then? I saw a questions form somebody on
this list, asking if the TB is still working on firmware updates, etc.
for the AT. As the AT gone completely dead (meaning not even firmware
updates in the foreseeable future)?

Brgds

Alvaro

-----Original Message-----
From: Turtle Beach Audiotron User Forum
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Seth Dotterer
Sent: Monday, March 07, 2005 10:24
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [AT] Open letter to Seth & TB (was Re: [AT] Reminder about
this forum.)

Yes, Arnt.  You're correct there.  Perhaps 'similar' would be better
than 'competing' - but I'm pretty sure that the people on this list have
been clear on what I'm asking for.=20

-----Original Message-----
From: Turtle Beach Audiotron User Forum
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Arnt Gulbrandsen
Sent: Monday, March 07, 2005 11:21 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: Open letter to Seth & TB (was Re: [AT] Reminder about this
forum.)

Jess Askey writes:
> I have been on this list for over two years and I have to agree with=20
> Michael. Is this really a competing product? I think not.

Perhaps what Seth really means is <any similar product>.

We've discussed amplifiers, loudspeakers, NASes, D/A converters, and
Seth hasn't protested. But he's protested every time we've touched on
MP3 players from other vendors, no matter whether it's in the same
market segment or not.

That doesn't quite chime with my understanding of <competing>, but it
does make sense... Seth, am I right?

Arnt