Re: Reminder about this forum.

Matt <[email protected]> Tue, 8 Mar 2005 08:03:22 -0500
Newsgroups gmane.comp.hardware.voyetra.audiotron
Message-ID <[email protected]>
The two questions that TB refuses to answer are:

1.  Why wont TB share the code with the public if there is no further
development?  Turn it into a legacy and open source project (there could
even be money to be made in licensening)

2.  Why keep this list running if the AT no longer exists?  Maybe once or
twince in the last few months has the discussion really been about a
technical question regarding the AT.  Most of the time the questions
revolve around products that complement the AT.

And to respond to ronstang's email...  Just because they "run" it doesnt
mean their rules should be arbitrary.  That "competitor" rule made sense
when there was a product to compete against.  TB should be happy that we
are still talking about this stuff and use our emails as market research.
Given the choice, if you had no current product, wouldnt you rahter have
people talk under your control versus elsewhere so you could monitor and
pick out ideas and steal them as your own?  Hmmmmm?

[email protected] said:
> In the midst of all your peacocking you forgot one very simple
> fact....VOYETRA runs this mailing list and thus you must only talk about
> things that they approve.  If you want to talk about a new product then
> start your own mailing list and take it there.  Why should people be
> allowed to do their market research on a mailing list that belongs to
> VOYETRA?  The list of e-mail addresses were gathered by VOYETRA and do not
> belong to anyone to use at their free will.
>
>
> On Mon, 2005-03-07 at 08:51, Seth Dotterer wrote:
>> I've asked Glenn to stop talking about his competitive endeavor in a
>> direct email.
>
> Seth, no disrespect dude, but you need to break out your Dictionary and
> look up the definition of "competitive".
>
> "Of or marked by competition". where "Competition" is
> "The act of
> competing; rivalry as in business, athletics, etc.  For this to be a
> "competitive product", VTB would have to have a product against which
> to
> compete.
>
> Do you have such a product?  From where I sit, the AT is dead by your
> own hand. I think it's time for you guys to decide whether the AT is
> dead or merely on life-support.  If you are preparing to announce a
> real, viable successor to the AT then GREAT, I can't wait to see it.
> But so far it's been all "smoke and mirrors".
>
> You can kick me off the list if you like as I sold my AT a few months
> back as I perceived it as a dead product.  Nothing your company has done
> since that has given me reason to doubt this logic.
> --
> - Mike Scott
> - [email protected]
>
>
>
> ___________________________________________________________________
> Speed up your surfing with Juno SpeedBand.
> Now includes pop-up blocker!
> Only $14.95/month -visit http://www.juno.com/surf to sign up today!
>