:: AIEEEIA 2026 :: Venice, Italy :: 1st International Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Emotions, Emphatics, Ethics and Illegal Algorithms ( AIEEEIA 2026 ) :: August, 27 - 29, 2026 :: PROGRAM ::
"ALAIPO: Asociación Latina Interacción Persona-Ordenador –L atin Association of HCI" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.hci.acm-sigchi.announce |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
:: AIEEEIA 2026 :: Program ::
:: 1st International Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Emotions, Emphatics, Ethics and Illegal Algorithms (AIEEEIA 2026)
:: Venice, Italy ::
:: August, 27 - 29, 2026 ::
https://www.alaipo.com/AIEEEIA-2026/conference_AIEEEIA_2026_program.html
:: Keynote speakers and relators:
- AI Agents to Elevate Efficiency and Innovative Marketing
- Autocracy and Theocracy in Educational and Employment Ecosystems: AI and the Spread of Ethical Misconduct
- Crisis of Press Freedom: Silencing the Truth with AI Illegal Algorithms and Bias Analysis Studies
- Toward More Inclusive Data Privacy and Security Strategies for Gen Z Social Media Influencers: A Statistical Study
:: Seminars (free for all)
- AI Tools in Information Technology Classroom: Results of the Best Practice in Eight Universities
- FES (Freedom of Expression Shield): Protection for Journalists in the Age of Generative Artificial Intelligence
:: Courses (free for all)
- How Can We Identify the Presence of Degenerate Educators in the Artificial Intelligence Community?
- Iberian Studies in Engineering and Exact Sciences: How to Avoid the “Sirens' Song”
:: Panels
- Confirming the Decline of European Education: 35 Years of Spanish “Anti-Models” in STREAM
- How to Lie and Attack under the Flag of Cyberbullying and AI: The Cases of the Psychopathic Teachers and Fake Feminists at Carlos III, La Laguna and Salamanca Universities
- Schools, Colleges, and Departments of Computer Science, Engineering, ICT and Mathematics under Francoism Principles: The Immutable Modus Operandi, Human Structures, and Educational Ecosystems
:: Parallel Session
- How to Inflate Google 'h & i10' indices from the Narco-Universities in Brazil, Chile, Colombia, Mexico, Paraguay, Peru, Portugal, and Spain
:: Books-in-Progress:
- Ibero-America at the Crossroads of Narco-Education (work-in-progress)
- Octopus-Computer Interaction (work-in-progress)
The program with table time it will be distributed to attendees at conference rooms. The list of accepted research works, their authors, best research, and so on, is not published online because for three long decades, certain entities prone to criminal activity, operating perfectly and covertly within the European / Ibero-American university ecosystem, have been attacking us and setting up Trojan horses. For example, by cloning committee members, flooding participants with advertising or spam, sending anonymous defamatory messages, infiltrating saboteurs into our events, discrediting on social media, copying innovative strategies and solutions to solve problems, and countless other illicit activities that go unpunished academically, professionally, legally, economically, ethically, etc., throughout the Americas and Europe. These are typical actions that comprise the "G" factor (G = Garduña / Gardunia). For more information, about "Gardunia Factor", please consult the following links:
1) https://www.pirateando.net/Garduna.html
2) https://www.igi-global.com/pdf.aspx?tid=273582&ptid=259901&ctid=17&t=Appendix&isxn=9781799870104
3) https://www.blueherons.net/Assessment%20Methods%20and%20Success%20Factors%20for%20Digital%20Education%20and%20New%20Media.pdf
:: AIEEEIA 2026 :: Introduction ::
Today, the democratizing impact of artificial intelligence reveals positive and negative effects stemming from sectors of society that seek to undermine this process. For example, users of interactive systems, as well as designers, programmers, analysts, engineers, and others working on computer systems, find themselves completely defenseless when algorithms are illegally manipulated by individuals who sell themselves to the highest bidder. In other words, when observe that some tiny groups within society, posing as false “champions of global users' rights”, attempt to control scientific developments.
An individual analysis of the members of these groups reveals that they were formed in societies that have endured long periods of dictatorship in the Americas, Africa, Asia, Europe, and so on. The vertical educational structures and the management of human capital have not changed over time. A common denominator among those at the top of this management structure has been their involvement with private and/or religious institutions at some stage of their education.
This is one of the reasons for the interest in the ethical implications of the rise of artificial intelligence, which is forming destructive and worldwide power lobbies, as is generally the case with the latest technological innovations, aimed at the base of the population pyramid. Actually, these groups can act with impunity from within the university sphere, sheltering under the umbrella of university autonomy, disabled people, gender studies, STEAM –just to cite a few examples–, in democratic countries. When discovered, they refuse to be investigated, citing reasons such as “the good of the university's corporate image.”
A close look at these individuals reveals the presence of narcissism, psychopathy, and Machiavellianism, yet they have managed to maximize their economic gain while minimizing labor costs. These groups have jumped on the bandwagon of artificial intelligence with the aim of increasing their mercantilist and tyrannical power. To this end, constantly they are resorting to terms like emotions, empathy, and ethics.
With the first, “emotions,” they expand into neurological aspects; with the second, “empathy,” they manipulate individual and social communication; and with the third, “ethics,” they present themselves as false champions of universal justice. This manipulation of the triad has been observed in recent decades in the evolution of usability engineering, human-computer interaction, user experience, human-centered design, interaction design and children, gender equality, educational ecosystems, information retrieval, recommender systems, empirical software engineering, web research, afective computing, podcasting, wearable sensors, and so on.
Interestingly, the ethical, and often aesthetic, epicenters of those who practice these deviations from the epistemology of science are located in private and/or religious education, which tend to be above any system of norms or legal structures. So much so that within these university educational contexts, they resort to lawyers to promote anonymity for their illegal actions, such as silencing journalists, censoring content on scientific platforms, threatening editors, and the relentless persecution and professional destruction of other colleagues, among many other criminal acts.
These actions are punishable under criminal law and are worlds apart from freedom of expression, or the rights to human dignity, the veracity of information, and the transparency of public officials' activities, among many others, such as the denigration of journalists, to cite just one example. These fake lawyers not only misuse social media, starting with digital photography, video, podcast, etc., in social networks, but also promote the distortion of reality in exchange for money from their corrupt clients. Therefore, they are invisible sources that daily promote social and academic corruption, among others, and also contribute to the academic failure of future generations interested in new technologies, the modernization of science, and education.
Actually, many of these actions remain hidden even with artificial intelligence. Consequently, we are facing an exponential phenomenon where artificial intelligence and all its positive applications take on a negative character when these human and social factors come into play. These negative components will daily undermine the harmonious progress of the democratization of sciences –formal, natural, and factual– whose ultimate goal is the common good of society. While there are many academic spaces where technological advancements in the use of artificial intelligence can be debated and exchanged regularly, in the form of seminars, workshops, symposia, conferences, etc., a significant gap is evident.
That is to say, there is a lack within AI that focuses attention on these human factors, where the Omega generation, through the ‘G’ factor (G = Garduña –Spanish or Gardunia –English) is once again attempting to undermine the democratization process of a new international computing tool.
Similar to the democratization of the internet in the 1990s, the communication gap described by Umberto Eco, between the apocalyptic and the integrated, is being exacerbated in AI by these destructive agents and their modus operandi. Hence, it is the importance of identifying the mechanisms and instruments employed by these destructive forces, through the latest advances in social networks and artificial intelligence.
Therefore, in this space, we place the user at the heart of the entire current and future technological context, which relates to the harmonious advancement of the responsible use of artificial intelligence, in contrast to those who, under the guise of a false legality, and the triadic relation between education narcotized, Gardunia factor and Omega generation, are fostering the destruction of the democratization process by resorting to the illegal use of computer algorithms (classical or quantum), whether intelligent or not.
By the way, we note that other associations, institutes, federations, etc., international pioneers in the advancement of computer science, electronics, information processing, and computing machinery, do not have mechanisms in place for the definitive eradication of these dangers for future generations of users. They only have bureaucratic mechanisms, such as filling out forms or email addresses, which not only fail to solve problems but also fail to respond to messages when ethics are conspicuously absent in certain areas that they themselves endorse, whether naively or consciously.
Simultaneously, hardware and software aspects of artificial intelligence, both current and those of the immediate future, will also be considered and studied in detail in this international event. In short, the aim here is unite and examine systemic problems / solutions about the interrelation between the latest developments, trends, and challenges of artificial intelligence in the educational, labor, commercial, industrial fields, and so on, placing the human being and the community at the center.
Kind regards,
International Secretariat
ALAIPO & AInCI
For more information: https://www.alaipo.com/AIEEEIA-2026/conference_AIEEEIA_2026.html
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from CHI-ANNOUNCEMENTS send an email to:
mailto:[email protected]
To manage your SIGCHI Mailing lists or read our polices see:
https://sigchi.org/operations/listserv/
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------