Re: Looking for discussion - Design contest websites
[email protected] Sun, 21 Feb 2010 15:53:27 -0500
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.hci.experiencedesign |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
that does sound interesting i actually would like to read more on that and other related discussions on making money as a designer, from such contests. Louis Abbatepaolo Photography/Graphic Design 631-864-2494 [email protected] http://www.louisabbatepaolo.com -----Original Message----- From: Tim Hardy <[email protected]> To: [email protected] Sent: Thu, Feb 18, 2010 6:04 pm Subject: [AIGAExperienceDesign] Looking for discussion - Design contest websites I'd like to start a pragmatic discussion on what might be done to bridge the gap between design contest sites and the concerns raised against them. I am a web developer who was recently laid off and I’m considering creating a site like crowdspring.com or 99designs.com (actually I think logotournament.com is the most impressive). I like the idea of a “design contest” site from a consumer standpoint, and it’s a good choice for an income-generating web app due to its simple revenue model. However, it didn’t take much research to discover the controversy over the idea of “crowdsourced design” or “spec work”. I’ve spent a lot of time reading all the perspectives on this issue, and I’m left with the following conclusions, among others: * The design contest sites are thriving and growing - evidence of a huge consumer demand * There’s a lot of room for improvement as far as raising the experience for the designers and the design profession in these sites Perhaps I’m naive to think that a site built around the idea of design contests could make significant progress towards raising the experience for both the designer and the design profession, but that’s exactly what I’d like to discuss with you. I believe that there has to be a way to create a “bridge” between the growing consumer driven demand for these sites and the defense of a high quality standard for the design profession. If anyone would like to begin such a dialogue, I would appreciate the opportunity. I have several ideas, but I welcome any and all of yours as I’m at the very beginning of this project. All I ask is that the discussion be open-minded, respectful, and with an eye towards pragmatism. At the very least, I see this discussion as surfacing some areas that could perhaps "reform" the existing design contest sites to some degree. I'm also open to being swayed to the point that I don't want to be involved in creating such a site, but I'm hoping that a design contest site driven by your ideas can at least push the others to follow suit in a positive direction (which would be a good thing). I can't think of any better way to vette ideas than to jump into a forum such as this one. Thank you for your time and your opinions. Tim -- View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/Looking-for-discussion---Design-contest-websites-tp27647264p27647264.html Sent from the AIGA Experience Design mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ------------------------------------ - - - - A I G A E X P E R I E N C E D E S I G N - - - - PURPOSE OF THE LIST: The objective of AIGA Experience Design is to build an interdisciplinary community of professionals who design for a world in which experiences are increasingly digital and connected. This list has been established as a forum for the exchange of information among community members. TO VIEW ARCHIVED MESSAGES: visit http://groups.yahoo.com/group/AIGAExperienceDesign ETIQUETTE: We ask that participants observe common principles of civility and e-mail etiquette in their postings. Specifically, it is more appropriate to challenge ideas than individuals, and the list should *not* be used for personal communications, self-promotion, commercial solicitations or job postings. JOB POSTINGS: Please post job listings on AIGA Design Jobs http://www.aiga.org/designjobs TO UNSUBSCRIBE: Send e-mail to [email protected] MORE INFORMATION: http://experiencedesign.aiga.org Yahoo! Groups Links [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]