Re: Possible change - numeric priorities?
Bo Daley <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.horde.whups |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Quoting Jan Schneider <[email protected]>: > Zitat von Chuck Hagenbuch <[email protected]>: > >> What would folks think of just having priority be a number from 0 to >> 100? Would >> make priorities more computer-processable and simpler. > > Yeah, but less intuitive for users. I already disliked the change in Nag, > though I understand it was necessary. Well I already name priorities with numbers at the start (and the default priorities do that too) like '1. Low', '2. Medium' etc.. That's just enough to make it possible to order columns by priority, but might not be enough for other stuff. What kind of processing were you thinking about? bo. -- Whups mailing list - Join the hunt: http://horde.org/bounties/#whups Frequently Asked Questions: http://horde.org/faq/ To unsubscribe, mail: [email protected]