Re: Possible change - numeric priorities?

Bo Daley <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.horde.whups
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Quoting Jan Schneider <[email protected]>:

> Zitat von Chuck Hagenbuch <[email protected]>:
>
>> What would folks think of just having priority be a number from 0 to 
>> 100? Would
>> make priorities more computer-processable and simpler.
>
> Yeah, but less intuitive for users. I already disliked the change in Nag,
> though I understand it was necessary.

Well I already name priorities with numbers at the start (and the default
priorities do that too) like '1. Low', '2. Medium' etc.. That's just enough to
make it possible to order columns by priority, but might not be enough for
other stuff. What kind of processing were you thinking about?

bo.




-- 
Whups mailing list - Join the hunt: http://horde.org/bounties/#whups
Frequently Asked Questions: http://horde.org/faq/
To unsubscribe, mail: [email protected]
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.