Re: Possible change - numeric priorities?
Chuck Hagenbuch <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.horde.whups |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Quoting Bo Daley <[email protected]>: > Well I already name priorities with numbers at the start (and the default > priorities do that too) like '1. Low', '2. Medium' etc.. That's just > enough to > make it possible to order columns by priority, but might not be enough for > other stuff. What kind of processing were you thinking about? I'm not sure, really. I guess the defaults like that are more flexible and good enough. Was just an idea. :) -chuck -- "Regard my poor demoralized mule!" - Juan Valdez -- Whups mailing list - Join the hunt: http://horde.org/bounties/#whups Frequently Asked Questions: http://horde.org/faq/ To unsubscribe, mail: [email protected]