Re: PHPEclipse "meeting" minutes for 06-16-08

Edward Mann <[email protected]> Fri, 20 Jun 2008 09:29:29 -0500
Newsgroups gmane.comp.ide.eclipse.phpeclipse.devel
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Lester and others,

Please see my comments below
On Tue, 2008-06-17 at 06:13 +0100, Lester Caine wrote:
> Mike Bowie wrote:
> > Despite the array of start times, rather little was said in the
> > meeting... and pretty much nothing that's not been said already.  One
> > resolution which had been passed without a vote is that future meeting
> > notices will include a list of start times respective to local timezones.
> 
> Sorry - I missed the meeting because of 'customer activity' and even now I
> need to get on-line to a customer site and sort some stuff out.
> 
> Do you have anything I can look at explaining why there is a need to get
> involved with spi-inc.org?
The reason to get involved with spi-inc.org are a few, and there may be more. This is just what i know
and the reasons that i feel it is a good way to to.
1. Asset management. People don't feel comfortable about turning domain names over to just another
individual, so spi-inc can be that entity that we can turn the names over to. This allows the active
developers to manage those resources. Currently we need to e-mail someone that is not active with the
project on certain names, and hope they will work with us.
2. People want to donate monetarily to the project. This would allow them to put their money in the 
project and know that it will be used for the project. This would help pay for servers, storage, hosting
fees, domain name renewals and other needs the project has.
3. Being a member of spi-inc.org the PHPEclipse project will gain their financial and legal services.

> I understand the need to improve the 'management' side of the project, and
> having lost the battle for recognition by Eclipse, that something else may be
> required. A discussion on that may be appropriate - somewhere we can all get
> involved? On-line undocumented activity is not the way to go .... The one
> thing we realised in the Firebird Foundation was that 'meetings' must be
> conducted on an email list so that everybody can see and contribute. Having
> been treasurer of that for a couple of years, I appreciate the problems of
> project management, and only stepped down because of a change to work load.
> 
We must start using the dev mailing list more. I agree with that. I have found that i put things out in
the channel, but that is not where allot of people watch for PHPEclipse development tasks. So your 
thoughts on using a mailing list is correct, and this list is the place we must start posting what
is going on in the project. However i feel the meetings still should happen in the channel, and then
have the notes from it posted to the mailing list. And people can reply to that.
> 
> I see the trac changes - not a format I've ever got on with and something else
> to distract from progress :( Why the HELL are we using a Python powered system
> for a PHP based project !!!! ( And it does not support Firebird so I would
> never even bother to list it as an option ;) )
> 
Why are we using a Java based system for a PHP based project? It's the
tool that works, so we use it. (but Trac does support Postgresql ;-) )
And we are using the sqlite db for the backend. And i feel that this
does not distract from progress. What was distracting me was going to
the sf site and it sometimes not working. They may have rectified the
issues by now, but at the time it was very annoying. Also with the
forum, ticket system, timeline, and wiki all in one place it makes it
very convenient. Another item to note is that with the integration Trac
has with mylyn in Eclipse i feel it will help boost productivity. But
that's just me.
> PHPEclipse is providing my day to day development needs in parallel with C++
> and other standards that Eclipse supports. I would love to see PHPEclipse
> recognised by the Eclipse project - PDT is not something I ever want to bother
> with - but I am getting some negative vibes from the changes that are being
> made and proposed at present!
I feel the same way about PHPEclipse being recognized by the Eclipse Project. And the way i see
to combat that, and to get recognized  is to make the PHPEclipse the
best PHP IDE for Eclipse. It should be so good that everyone looks at
PDT and thinks "What the heck! Why is Eclipse supporting and IDE with so
little features and functionality! PHPEclipse does way more than this,
it should be what Eclipse.org is pushing!". We (I) want to be that
Community based project that simply works and does the best job at what
it;s supposed to do.
> Now I have 2 hours to sort out another site ...
> 
Now i have the rest of the day to work on RCP app, and watch for
comments.

Have a good one, and thanks for your input. Keeps us on our toes.


-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out the new SourceForge.net Marketplace.
It's the best place to buy or sell services for
just about anything Open Source.
http://sourceforge.net/services/buy/index.php