Re: Re: [UnixOS2] libc

On Wed, 16 Jul 2003, Andreas Buening wrote:

> This makes sense. A patch should contain of
> 
> - a ChangeLog entry (who did what and when)
> - a short description (why and what)
> - the patch itself
> - the updated docs (if necessary)
> - the updated Makefile (if necessary; can also be done by someone else
>   if the contributor of the patch doesn't know how to do it).

You do realize that it would take decades to incorporate all the missing
functions from Posix/2 that way, don't you?
I guess, that's the point where I definitely loose interest in doing the
project this way (or even at all, actually, though that later part might
change once I calm down again).

	Regards,
		Stefan