Re: Re: [UnixOS2] libc

On Wed, 16 Jul 2003 00:08:32 +0200, Andreas Buening wrote:

>As long as nobody objects or tells us of any "must have" features
>at sourceforge, I'd say set up a CVS repository at netlabs.

fine for me

>Btw, what's the "current" emx source? The sources from the gcc 2.8.1
>package plus emx 0.9f? And I think we should also add the emx docs
>in an extra directory (but what do we want to use as "source" language
>for the docs?).

Should I create an empty repository or should I take some codebase as
initial repository? The second option means less work for the person
who would checkin the initial source otherwise.

If someone can point me to this "current" OS/2 source I will set up the
repository tomorrow. I have to hurry a bit because I will be in
holidays for three weeks soon (leaving monday). So all who would like
to have access to this repository should send me a proposal for a
username and (if you want) a password (otherwise I generate one for
you). Please send that ASAP.

btw how do we want to call the repository? simply libc?

cu

Adrian


-- 
Adrian Gschwend
@ netlabs.org

ktk [a t] netlabs.org
-------
Free Software for OS/2 and eCS
http://www.netlabs.org