Re: Re: [UnixOS2] libc

On Thu, 17 Jul 2003 06:26:37 +0200, Andreas Buening wrote:

>If I remember correctly I've installed the sources that are part
>of gcc 2.8.1 from hobbes (gccsrc*.zip but I'm not sure) plus some
>update from the emx fixes (the last one, i.e. 0.9f?).=20

Just an update regarding CVS, I didn't create it because of the
following reasons:

Knut St. Osmundsen (aka bird) told me that it would be very stupid to
create a CVS at the moment, Innotek does have a CVS for gcc and a new
libc. Innotek did a lot of work, for instance starting updating header
to FreeBSD 5.1 level. Their "testcase" is Mozilla (which is not an easy
one I would say).

Achim Hasenm=FCller is not in the office until the end of next week so
Knut can't give a lot of comments about release & CVS access for "us".
But I would suggest we should wait for him, he can give some detailled
comments about CVS read & write access and release plans.

Like this we avoid creating two different projects with basically the
same goal and this would be very stupid for the whole OS/2 scene IMHO.

I hope you agree that we should wait another week until we get some
comments by Innotek.

I will CC this mail to Achim as well, I hope he finds the time to give
some more light into the thingy next week.

cu

Adrian




--=20
Adrian Gschwend
@ netlabs.org

ktk [a t] netlabs.org
-------
Free Software for OS/2 and eCS
http://www.netlabs.org