Re: Re: [UnixOS2] libc
Stefan Neis <neis-RCUrBZHvLvKSHq+C5vT0LZQlNPQFfrerqZSUQi4AVrg@public.gmane.org> Fri, 18 Jul 2003 18:35:56 +0200 (CEST)
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.ide.emx.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <Pine.GSO.4.21.0307181833220.6261-100000@cdc-ultra4.cdc.informatik.tu-darmstadt.de> |
On Fri, 18 Jul 2003, Adrian Gschwend wrote: > libc. Innotek did a lot of work, for instance starting updating header > to FreeBSD 5.1 level. I don't quite understand how "FreeBSD 5.1 level" and some earlier statements (implying that the runtime wouldn't have Unix support to the extent of EMX in my reading) can possibly be both correct at the same time, but this sounds really good... Regards, Stefan -- Micro$oft is not an answer. It is a question. The answer is 'no'.