Re: Re: [UnixOS2] libc

On Fri, Jul 18, 2003 at 05:19:30PM +0200, Adrian Gschwend wrote:
> Knut St. Osmundsen (aka bird) told me that it would be very stupid to
> create a CVS at the moment, Innotek does have a CVS for gcc and a new
> libc.

New libc should not have anything to do with keeping the old libc
working.  On the other hand, it may.

> Innotek did a lot of work, for instance starting updating header
> to FreeBSD 5.1 level. Their "testcase" is Mozilla (which is not an easy
> one I would say).

What may be more trivial to port than a web browser?  It is circa 20
lines of C to implement (the rest being the graphic engine - which has
nothing to do with libc...).

Only 1/2 of ;-).

Ilya