Re: Re: [UnixOS2] libc

Ilya Zakharevich wrote:

[snip]

> If someone wants to translate the EMX docs into a more "lightweight"
> format (and Perl's POD or its widespread extensions immediately comes
> to mind), they are welcome.

Never heard of it.


> But this is an *orthogonal* target.

It's not really orthogonal. If we start a new emx release we should
also start to create docs in the final format. If function foo
is updated then also an uptodate foo manpage (or whatever) has to
be provided. This way, it might take a long time before we have
a consistent set of doc files but we're on the right way.


Bye,
Andreas