Re: Re: [UnixOS2] libc
Stefan Neis <neis-RCUrBZHvLvKSHq+C5vT0LZQlNPQFfrerqZSUQi4AVrg@public.gmane.org> Tue, 8 Jul 2003 17:10:15 +0200 (CEST)
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.ide.emx.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <Pine.GSO.4.21.0307081705270.4477-100000@cdc-ultra4.cdc.informatik.tu-darmstadt.de> |
On Tue, 8 Jul 2003, Ilya Zakharevich wrote: > I repeat: > > a) I know of no issue with 2.8.1 + dmake (but of course, this may be > just ignorance). While I agree, the problem is that whatever new source one adds (e.g. Posix/2), it won't be happy with dmake. While mixing two different makes is certainly possible, it's also possibly confusing. > > it is (IMHO) necessary to have a _working_ release directly at the > > beginning so we can revert to this working version if anything goes > > wrong. > > Again, I do not follow. All the releases should be treated this way... I suppose, that's the CVS point of view. Start CVS with something that's working, so their is a solid grounding... Regards, Stefan