Re: Re: [UnixOS2] libc

On Tue, Jul 08, 2003 at 05:10:15PM +0200, Stefan Neis wrote:
> >   a) I know of no issue with 2.8.1 + dmake (but of course, this may be
> > 	just ignorance).
> 
> While I agree, the problem is that whatever new source one adds (e.g.
> Posix/2), it won't be happy with dmake. While mixing two different makes
> is certainly possible, it's also possibly confusing.

???  Why adding a couple of new C files would require a change of $MAKE?

> > > it is (IMHO) necessary to have a _working_ release directly at the
> > > beginning so we can revert to this working version if anything goes
> > > wrong.

> > Again, I do not follow.  All the releases should be treated this way...

> I suppose, that's the CVS point of view. Start CVS with something that's
> working, so their is a solid grounding...

???  Start with the EM's released version.

Thanks for your contributions,
Ilya