Re: Re: [UnixOS2] libc
Stefan Neis <neis-RCUrBZHvLvKSHq+C5vT0LZQlNPQFfrerqZSUQi4AVrg@public.gmane.org> Fri, 11 Jul 2003 01:52:10 +0200 (CEST)
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.ide.emx.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <Pine.GSO.4.21.0307110148380.5230-100000@cdc-ultra4.cdc.informatik.tu-darmstadt.de> |
On Thu, 10 Jul 2003, Andreas Buening wrote: > The question is can the current build system do this or can it be > implemented? If not, then it might be the better decision to create > a new build system. I rather liked the idea to intially have to different branches, one for those fiddling with the make system and one for people fiddling with the code itself and then merge those together when they work. That way, lack of progress in one direction doesn't stop progress in the other direction. Looks like we are entering a cycle ... ;-) Regards, Stefan -- Micro$oft is not an answer. It is a question. The answer is 'no'.