Re: Re: [UnixOS2] libc

Stefan Neis <neis-RCUrBZHvLvKSHq+C5vT0LZQlNPQFfrerqZSUQi4AVrg@public.gmane.org> Fri, 11 Jul 2003 01:52:10 +0200 (CEST)
Newsgroups gmane.comp.ide.emx.devel
Message-ID <Pine.GSO.4.21.0307110148380.5230-100000@cdc-ultra4.cdc.informatik.tu-darmstadt.de>
On Thu, 10 Jul 2003, Andreas Buening wrote:

> The question is can the current build system do this or can it be
> implemented? If not, then it might be the better decision to create
> a new build system.

I rather liked the idea to intially have to different branches, one for
those fiddling with the make system and one for people fiddling with the
code itself and then merge those together when they work. That way, lack
of progress in one direction doesn't stop progress in the other direction.

Looks like we are entering a cycle ... ;-)

	Regards,
		Stefan
-- 
Micro$oft is not an answer. It is a question. The answer is 'no'.