Re: Re: [UnixOS2] libc

On Thu, Jul 10, 2003 at 11:41:10PM +0200, Andreas Buening wrote:
> >   a) I know of no issue with 2.8.1 + dmake (but of course, this may be
> >         just ignorance).
> 
> The gcc version is more or less irrelevant as long as we're talking
> about C, so 2.8.1 is okay. Whether we want dmake should be discussed.

I see no need for a discussion.  dmake vs make is *orthogonal* to bug
fixes and enhancements.  Using portable constructs is the best; I do
not see any reason to *discuss* an update to portable makefiles.

But only *when* such an update is made available.  It is not a
prerequisite.  The situation is tolerable without such an update.  The
situation is fine with such an update.

Is there anything else to discuss?  ;-)

Ilya