RE: FATHUM
"Marcel van Mackelenbergh" <[email protected]> Thu, 29 Jan 2004 18:38:26 +0100
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.infodesign.facetedclassification |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <001501c3e68e$b3641110$0300a8c0@marcel> |
Me too I would like to make my compliments. Coming from the usability arena, I was always surprised why most classifications are still around the subject of the information. In Lucent we always used to index information elements not only according to the subject (In Lucent the subject is the product that we describe). But in Lucent we also used to index information according to the user scenario in which the information is useful. User scenario's consist of: - the person (experience, education and function) - who has a certain goal - and finds him(her)self in a certain situation - and therefore engages into a certain task As you can tell, my 'standard' way of organizing information is by using the following facets: - subject - person - goal - situation I am very happy with your classification Aida because I see a discipline for standardizing faceted metadata emerging. My 'standard' fits in your proposal very well. Please keep up the good work Marcel Marcel van Mackelenbergh Human Performance Engineer P.C. Hooftstraat 20 5242CH Rosmalen the Netherlands telephone: +31 73 522 3022 email: <mailto:[email protected]> [email protected] homepage: <http://members.home.nl/mackelenbergh> http://members.home.nl/mackelenbergh [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] ---------- Thanks for playing. Yahoo! Groups Links To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/facetedclassification/ To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [email protected] Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/