Re: Michelle Obama takes on childhood obesity (and product labelling)
Deborah Taylor-Pearce <[email protected]> Sat, 13 Feb 2010 16:29:27 -0800
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.infodesign.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Alison wrote: > (incidentally in the UK the > Tory party has adopted Thaler's > Nudge; the Labour party have > adopted Robert Cialdini's > Influence). What a fascinating tidbit! Over here, many conservatives are suspicious even of "nudges," especially when emanating from government sources. If they thought congressional democrats were using Cialdini's "scientifically proven ways to be persuasive" on them -- funded by taxpayer dollars -- the new Tea Party probably could foment a 2nd American Revolution! ;-) > Looking back at old film > footage (1940s and 50s, > rarely a bulge in sight > during and after war-time > rationing) I think supply > may be the only answer, > and limited access to > motorised transport. For some demographics (Information Designers, say? ;-), you may be right. However, in the U.S., there are way too many communities where there is a lot more hunger than food. Yet, even in areas where poverty has already limited the food supply, obesity and diseases such as diabetes are still prevalent. Similarly, there are communities in the U.S. with surprisingly little motorized transport, which brings on its own health issues, as pointed out by the activist Bus Riders Union (an arm of the progressive-to-left, multicultural Labor/Community Strategy Center in Los Angeles), which first organized in 1995 around the link it saw between environmental racism and racism in L.A.'s mass transportation policies (e.g., in 1997, their "Fight for the Night" street demonstration and other activism forced L.A.'s Metropolitan Transportation Authority to reinstate night time bus service cuts). And in 2005, BRU launched its "Clean Air Clean Lungs Clean Buses" campaign, "linking the fights against air toxins and climate change gases -- where L.A.'s auto system is a major source for both -- to the fight for a world class, bus-centered transit system." (If anyone's interested, their report _The Bus Riders Union Transit Model: Why a Bus-Centered System Will Best Serve U.S. Cities_, authored by "new urbanist" transportation planner Ryan Snyder, is available online at http://www.thestrategycenter.org/ ). So not everyone lives in idyllic neighborhoods where it's safe to saunter down to the corner store for groceries ... assuming there even is a corner store in the neighborhood that sells unprocessed foods. Moreover, researchers are learning that obesity (yet another complex & "contested" modern medical condition/identity, as Obama and Lehrer circled around in the _PBS NewsHour_ interview) is probably more dynamic and on the move than most of us are, even when we do get enough exercise. Here, I'm thinking not only of the very *active* role played by lipids in the human body, and the new thinking that, as with cholesterol, there is "good" and "bad" body fat (e.g., from a 14 Aug. 2005 article in the _San Diego Union-Tribune_: "For all the women who look down on their ample thighs with loathing: Fret no more. There is new reason to love that dimpled plumpness. "For many people, mainly women, fat on legs, hips and buttocks may help ward off heart disease and diabetes, recent research suggests. ... When women were also heavy above the waist, most advantages of the leg fat vanished, but thick thighs still improved their scores on triglycerides, potentially harmful fats in the blood." ), but also of new research on childhood obesity showing how it causes actual, lasting changes to human biochemistry: "Science is helping doctors better understand why many youngsters and adults can't seem to shed pounds through diet and exercise once they've packed on an excessive amount of weight. "'It turns out that once you're about 100 pounds over your ideal body weight, your body has reset its thermostat,' said Dr. Sunil Bhoyrul, a bariatric surgeon in San Diego. "The process works this way: Overeating produces an oversupply of insulin, which causes the body to use more of its energy to store fat. That tricks the body into thinking it's being starved when it isn't. The body responds by lowering physical activity, increasing hunger pangs and converting even more energy into fat. "'This is not about a habit that has gone bad. This is about a physiological illness,' Bhoyrul said." (from 21 Sept. 2008 article in the _San Diego Union-Tribune_) + "If you look at children at the age of two or three, they compensate. If you give them more calories in one meal, they'll eat less later in the day. But if they get exposed to sugar, fat, and salt all day for a few years, they lose the ability to compensate. By age four or five, they're eating all the time." (David Kessler, from interview with the editors of _Nutrition Action_, July/August 2009 issue) I guess what I'm trying to say here is that there's no one-size-fits-all solution to the growing problem of childhood obesity in the U.S. ... which is why I think *education* (of children and adults), followed by community-based solutions & initiatives, supported in turn by judicious state and federal policies & wise use of resources, remains our best strategy for going forward. I still believe that it's the "nudges" we come up with for ourselves (rather than having others manipulate us from on high) which have the best chance of working. E.g., not every "nudge" recommended by Tufts University's Susan Roberts (author of _The Instinct Diet_) is going to work equally well for each of us. I don't see myself pouring water over the leftover French Fries on my dinner plate when eating out at a restaurant, which is one of her 5 tips for fighting "restaurant syndrome": "1. NIP NEGATIVE CYCLES IN THE BUD. After an indulgent night of eating out, start your day with a bowl of high-fiber cereal. "2. EAT OUT LESS FREQUENTLY, EVEN IF YOU GO OUT JUST AS OFTEN. Try eating at home before a social event, then just nibble lightly while being sociable. "3. NEVER ARRIVE STARVING. Snack on something satisfying before you eat out, such as an apple. "4. MICROMANAGE YOUR ORDER. Be specific about what you want, from salad dressing on the side to no cheese atop the French onion soup. "5. TAKE CONTROL OVER THE SIGNALS YOUR EYES AND NOSE SEND YOUR BRAIN. Drape a napkin over the bread basket. Spill some water on those leftover fries." But I do see myself beginning every day after a night of indulgence with a bowl of high-fiber cereal. Best of all, it's nice to know enough to be able to pick-and-choose from lots of options, and make my own trade-offs like this. Too often, we just don't have enough information to be able to exercise real choice. Strictly speaking, I suppose the many tactical interventions suggested by David Kessler in _The End of Overeating: Taking Control of the Insatiable American Appetite_ aren't really "nudges" either, because they require mindfulness at the point of execution. Kessler's guide to making it through "Food Rehab" and resisting the pull of unhealthy foods asks us to act preemptively on ourselves. E.g., "1. REPLACE CHAOS WITH STRUCTURE. Determine ahead of time what you'll eat for meals and snacks. Block out everything else. "2. PRACTICE JUST-RIGHT EATING. Figure out how much food you need. (Odds are, it's less than you think.) Put it on your plate and don't go back for more. "3. PICK FOODS THAT WILL SATISFY, NOT STIMULATE, YOU. What satisfies you is personal, but try foods that occur in nature, like whole grains, beans, non-starchy vegetables, and fruit, combined with lean protein and a small amount of fat. "4. REHEARSE. Anticipate your moves like an elite athlete before a competition. For example, tell yourself, 'If I encounter chocolate-covered pretzels, I'll keep walking.' "5. SEIZE CONTROL. Stay alert to emotional stressors or other stimuli that trigger automatic behavior. Recognize emotions (like sadness, fatigue, or anxiety) that might lead you to overeat. "6. STOP THAT THOUGHT. Change the channel. Turn off the image of the trigger food before you start to debate whether to eat it. "7. THINK NEGATIVE. Pair the unhealthy food with a stream of (unappealing) images. 'That's the flip side of what advertising agencies do when they link an Olympic athlete to a pair of sneakers or an attractive woman to a new piece of technology,' says Kessler." But re-designing food labels for better information transparency at the point of sale -- in line with Kessler's warning about misleading obfuscation in _The End of Overeating_ -- *would* probably qualify as a "nudge" I think: "'If a food contains more sugar than any other ingredient, federal regulations dictate that sugar be listed first on the label. But if a food contains several different kinds of sweeteners, they can be listed separately, which pushes each one farther down the list.' Breakfast cereals, for example, often include a combination of sugar, brown sugar, fructose, high-fructose corn syrup, honey and molasses -- in part so moms looking at the labels don't spot 'sugar' as the top ingredient." (from the Special Supplement to Tufts' _Health & Nutrition Letter_ for Aug. 2009) Imagine if the "Ingredients" label on U.S. processed foods -- currently printed in small, sans serif, ALL CAPS right-justified type, with minimal leading, thus making the block paragraph as hard as possible to read in full, and requiring many mothers and grandmothers to get out their reading glasses in the supermarket aisle even to attempt it -- was redesigned as a folksonomy "tag" cloud ... or given an eye-catching graphic treatment like a simple bar chart.... These would be regulated "nudges" I think even the most wary of us could support. Deborah _____ Deborah Taylor-Pearce [email protected] ___________________________________________________________________ Use the following address to post a message to all subscribers: [email protected] To subscribe, unsubscribe or change your options, visit: http://list.InformationDesign.org/mailman/listinfo/infodesign-cafe For all Information Design matters: http://InformationDesign.org Problems? Write to: [email protected] ___________________________________________________________________