Re: Who is in favour of empirical research approach?
Gunnar Swanson <[email protected]> Sat, 13 Mar 2010 12:56:51 -0500
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.infodesign.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
I fall somewhere in the middle of this. My clients are often small enough that the cost of finding out much about what would be effective would exceed the value of knowing. My experience with "researchers" has not all been good. For example, my students are currently working on a project with a "research" project here at East Carolina University. I believe that I understand the research in their field better than they do. They hide behind being "scientific" even when they wander away from anything backed by actual research. When pressed for reasons for their decisions and demands they resort to "we like it" even though they are working with my students because they say that research shows that designers who are closer to the target audience are more effective. They are among the least strategic people I have ever met. Most of the time when marketing people have told me "research says x is better" I have discovered that they either misunderstand the research or are speaking in third hand generalities learned in class somewhere. It is easy to understand designers taking the position that research is an impediment to good design. That said, I strongly believe that certain (not all) research can inspire creative and effective design and move it forward. Even if that were not true, the research faction has a more effective bit of rhetoric than the traditional design faction so clients will believe them, thus research is inevitable. If the research is controlled by designers, it will be inspirational at best and harmless at worst. If it is controlled by others, it will be a hindrance to design unless we educate researchers. One way or another, designers need to participate in design-related research, if only for self-preservation. As much as I am not a Jakob Nielsen fan, he is right about how much information you can get out of very little testing. It is worthwhile to see if people understand what we assume they understand. That doesn't lead me to believe that A/B testing every design decision or trying to find or follow a set of rules for design is a worthwhile future. A lot of worthwhile empirical information can be cheap and casual, comparable to making dummies and quick prototypes of various sorts. I try to get my students to think in terms of what they could learn that would be helpful as designers. I discourage them from asking friends and roommates questions like "Which of these do you like?" and instead try to get them to be at once more specific and more general--"What do you think the coffee in each of these tastes like?" or "Tell me what you feel about the company behind each of these." Gunnar ---------- Gunnar Swanson Design Office 1901 East 6th Street Greenville NC 27858 USA [email protected] +1 252 258 7006 all new website: http://www.gunnarswanson.com On Mar 12, 2010, at 1:57 PM, Jose Marconi Bezerra de Souza wrote: > Randal, > > I appreciate your sincerity. > I think that there are many others who think just like you. > > However, how do you test if your design ideas are really working? > > José. > > On 12 March 2010 15:22, Randal <[email protected]> wrote: > At 2:35 AM -0700 3/8/10, [email protected] wrote: > >Jose's title was not clearly formulated in line with his intention: > >"Who is in favour of empirical research approach?" I doubt somebody > in > >this group could not be in favour. > > > > Personally, as a designer, I have never ever seen ANY empirical > research results that didn't either: > > 1. Merely state the obvious. > > 2. Indicate preference for a design direction that any half decent > designer could have directed you to in five minutes. > > 3. Create results that are essentially useless or at worst > completely misleading. > > Empirical design at its best only prevents really bad and stupid > design decisions at about ten times the cost of a good designer who > could do exactly the same thing. > > -- Randal > [email protected] +1 252 258 7006 ___________________________________________________________________ Use the following address to post a message to all subscribers: [email protected] To subscribe, unsubscribe or change your options, visit: http://list.InformationDesign.org/mailman/listinfo/infodesign-cafe For all Information Design matters: http://InformationDesign.org Problems? Write to: [email protected] ___________________________________________________________________