Re: Falsify Platonism?
Jon Awbrey <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.inquiry |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Re: http://www.cs.nyu.edu/pipermail/fom/2010-April/014586.html et seq. I am puzzled by the statements that I'm reading under this heading. As I understand it, the platonic position is simply that there are objective realities of a formal, general, or ideal nature to which our concepts at best refer. There is no conceit that our concepts, as we currently conceive then, are ideally suited to their intents. Jon Awbrey -- inquiry list: http://stderr.org/pipermail/inquiry/ mwb: http://www.mywikibiz.com/Directory:Jon_Awbrey knol: http://knol.google.com/k/-/-/3fkwvf69kridz/1 oeiswiki: http://www.oeis.org/wiki/User:Jon_Awbrey