Re: Sign Relational Manifolds
Jon Awbrey <[email protected]> Sat, 03 Nov 2012 23:02:52 -0400
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.inquiry |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
NB. I've rewritten that last note in a way I think is slightly more clear.
http://inquiryintoinquiry.com/2012/11/01/sign-relational-manifolds-5/
Peircers,
Let me try to say in intuitive terms what I think is really going on here.
The problem we face is as old as the problem of other minds, or intersubjectivity, or even
commensurability, and it naturally involves a whole slew of other old problems — reality and
appearance, or reality and representation, not to mention the one and the many. One way to sum up
the question might be “conditions on the possibility of a mutually objective world”.
Working on what oftentimes seems like the tenuous assumption that there really is a real world
causing the impressions in my mind and the impressions in yours — more generally speaking, that
there really is a real world impressing itself in systematic measures on every frame of reference —
we find ourselves pressed to give an account of the hypothetical unity beneath the manifest
diversity — and how it is possible to discover the former in the latter.
Manifold theory proposes one type of solution to that host of problems.
Regards,
Jon
--
academia: http://independent.academia.edu/JonAwbrey
my word press blog: http://inquiryintoinquiry.com/
inquiry list: http://stderr.org/pipermail/inquiry/
mwb: http://www.mywikibiz.com/Directory:Jon_Awbrey
oeiswiki: http://www.oeis.org/wiki/User:Jon_Awbrey
facebook page: https://www.facebook.com/JonnyCache