Re: Analogy
Jon Awbrey <[email protected]> Thu, 22 Nov 2012 11:42:18 -0500
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.inquiry |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Analogy was a hot topic in AI and Cognitive Science in the 80s. It was a big part of courses I took from Dedre Gentner in psych and David Plaisted in computer science at UIUC at the time. Deep in the middle of basting a turkey right now -- will dig up a bib later. No, the other kind of bib. Regards, Jon P.S. Which branch of Cooley? http://inquiryintoinquiry.com On Nov 22, 2012, at 10:41 AM, Jack Rooney <[email protected]> wrote: > Analogy has been very important in Anglo-American legal reasoning. Peirce was in a discussion group with lawyers. On the Continent the Swiss code prescribed statutory analogy for gaps in the law. Before I went to law school I participated in a seminar on Aristotle. Max Fisch presided. Many people on the list know that Fisch helped to revive interest in Peirce and Vico. It's amazing to me that Aristotle continues to be so influential. John Rooney, Cooley Law School > > ----------------------------- > PEIRCE-L subscribers: Click on "Reply List" or "Reply All" > to REPLY ON PEIRCE-L to this message. PEIRCE-L posts should go to [email protected] . To UNSUBSCRIBE, send a message not to peirce-l but to [email protected] with the line > "UNSubscribe peirce-l" in the BODY of the message. More at http://www.cspeirce.com/peirce-l/peirce-l.htm . > > > _______________________________________________ Inquiry mailing list [email protected] http://stderr.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/inquiry