Tenacity, Authority, Plausibility, Inquiry
Jon Awbrey <[email protected]> Tue, 15 Jan 2013 18:00:47 -0500
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.inquiry |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Peircers, It never ceases to amaze me how often I run across discussions here and there on the web that bring to mind Peirce's insights and make them seem as fresh as if they were penned in our time. I recorded today's instance in the following blog post: Re: Peter Cameron At: http://cameroncounts.wordpress.com/2010/01/03/mathematics-and-logic/ My favorite polymathematician, Charles Sanders Peirce, gave a fourfold classification of what he called “methods of fixing belief”, or “settling opinion”, most notably and seminally in his paper, “The Fixation of Belief (http://www.cspeirce.com/menu/library/bycsp/fixation/fx-frame.htm)” (1877). Adjusting his nomenclature slightly, if only for the sake of preserving a mnemonic rhyme scheme, we may refer to his four types as Tenacity, Authority, Plausibility (à priori pleasingness), and full-fledged Scientific Inquiry. http://inquiryintoinquiry.com/2013/01/15/tenacity-authority-plausibility-inquiry/ Regards, Jon -- academia: http://independent.academia.edu/JonAwbrey my word press blog: http://inquiryintoinquiry.com/ inquiry list: http://stderr.org/pipermail/inquiry/ mwb: http://www.mywikibiz.com/Directory:Jon_Awbrey oeiswiki: http://www.oeis.org/wiki/User:Jon_Awbrey facebook page: https://www.facebook.com/JonnyCache