Re: Peirce’s 1870 “Logic Of Relat ives” • Proto-Graphical Syntax

Thread:
JA:http://inquiryintoinquiry.com/2014/02/12/peirces-1870-logic-of-relatives-%E2%80%A2-proto-graphical-syntax/
JA:http://web.archive.org/web/20140213040003/http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.science.philosophy.peirce/11752
HR:http://web.archive.org/web/20140213040631/http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.science.philosophy.peirce/11753
JA:http://web.archive.org/web/20140213202033/http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.science.philosophy.peirce/11763
JA:http://web.archive.org/web/20140214044637/http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.science.philosophy.peirce/11765
JA:http://web.archive.org/web/20140214202003/http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.science.philosophy.peirce/11774
JBD:http://web.archive.org/web/20140214044455/http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.science.philosophy.peirce/11764
JA:http://web.archive.org/web/20140214214403/http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.science.philosophy.peirce/11778
JND:http://web.archive.org/web/20140214044553/http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.science.philosophy.peirce/11767 


John,

Thanks for the note of appreciation.

Honesty will require me, however, to lay equal weight on the other side of the coin.
Peirce's categories are the starting blocks — the Ready, Set, Bang❢ — of pragmatism
and semiotics, but too many inquiries fixate on the blocks and shy at the first hurdle.
I cannot imagine that Peirce designed his categories as catacombs, the place where
pragmatism goes to die.

So let's all be on guard against that ...

Regards,

Jon

-- 

academia: http://independent.academia.edu/JonAwbrey
my word press blog: http://inquiryintoinquiry.com/
inquiry list: http://stderr.org/pipermail/inquiry/
isw: http://intersci.ss.uci.edu/wiki/index.php/JLA
oeiswiki: http://www.oeis.org/wiki/User:Jon_Awbrey
facebook page: https://www.facebook.com/JonnyCache
_______________________________________________
Inquiry mailing list
[email protected]
http://stderr.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/inquiry