Re: Peirce's 1870 “Logic Of Relatives ” • Comment 8.5
Jon Awbrey <[email protected]> Thu, 03 Apr 2014 17:10:22 -0400
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.inquiry |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Re: JA:http://inquiryintoinquiry.com/2014/02/20/peirces-1870-logic-of-relatives-%E2%80%A2-comment-8-5/ CG:http://web.archive.org/web/20140222153200/http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.science.philosophy.peirce/11855 JBD:http://web.archive.org/web/20140224152510/http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.science.philosophy.peirce/11885 Clark, Jeff, List, We were in the middle of trying to sort out what bearing contemporary mathematical graph theory might have on the types of “graphs” that Peirce discussed, for instance especially, his logical graphs, entitative and existential, and on the more general run of complex iconic signs that we would not be amiss in calling diagrams, figures, illustrations, etc. I referred to a definition of a graph that is fairly standard among graph theorists and also many computer scientists. There are of course many other ways of defining the same class of mathematical objects. Most of these differ but verbally and most of the rest differ only in their exclusion or inclusion of certain boundary cases, like whether to count structures with no points and no lines as graphs or not. One used to see some really silly arguments break out at graph theory conferences over these trifles many years ago, but I think a modus vivendi has largely been worked out between the different schools of thought by now. From this humble root springs a wide variety of graph-theoretical structures. Some of these are simple species within the genus of graphs proper, for example, connected graphs, forests, trees, cacti. Others are genuine variations on the main theme, for example, labeled graphs, colored graphs, digraphs (directed graphs), and so on. Next time we'll look at the definitions of “digraphs” and “digraphs with loops” and that will bring us to levels of generality that are suitable for dealing with dyadic relations in general, at least in the finite case. To be continued ... Jon -- academia: http://independent.academia.edu/JonAwbrey my word press blog: http://inquiryintoinquiry.com/ inquiry list: http://stderr.org/pipermail/inquiry/ isw: http://intersci.ss.uci.edu/wiki/index.php/JLA oeiswiki: http://www.oeis.org/wiki/User:Jon_Awbrey facebook page: https://www.facebook.com/JonnyCache _______________________________________________ Inquiry mailing list [email protected] http://stderr.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/inquiry