[openi18n-im:01099] Re: name space cleanup

Date: Mon, 25 Oct 2004 16:51:18 +0900 (JST)
From: Akira TAGOH <[email protected]>:
> >>>>> On Mon, 25 Oct 2004 13:45:04 +0900,
> >>>>> "AK" == AShiZaWa KaZuNoRi <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> AK> Four binaries.
> 
> AK> iiimd (htt), which is executed by init script.
> AK> iiim-server (htt_server), which is executed by iiimd (htt).
> AK> iiimx (httx), which is executed by X startup script.
> AK> iiim-xbe (htt_xbe), which is executed by iiimx (httx).
> 
> AK> These binaries are not intended to be executed directly by
> AK> users, even though they can be.
> 
> I don't think it should be moved under /usr/lib. ok. for
> another example, gimlet is also a binary program. but users
> can't runs gimlet directly (or from the terminal) due to the
> limitation/mechanism of GNOME applet. as you say, those four
> binaries can be, and we don't restrict it, no? :)

FHS uses the term ``intended'', and we do not intend these
binaries to be executed directly, and also we do not prohibit.
No conflict here.

OK.  If nobody think this relocation can violate FHS, I have no
concern any more.

**

Please share other issues, concerns, or objections on this name
space cleanup, if any.


Thanks,
-- 
kasha