Re: New version to kick around.
Alex Stapleton <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.ipod.ephpod |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
> I've found that even obvious differences are less obvious in blind > testing. ymmv. Based on blind tests around here, telling the difference > between lame -aps and original wav is much easier than telling the > difference between psytel -normal, nero normal/high and original wav. Psytel Research (cunningly the people that made the Psytel encoder) got bought out by Ahead. So the Nero encoder is the latest version, and so presumably the best. Which isn't something I think we really need to argue about, unless there are other (non-Psytel) encoders about. > At 10:12 AM 5/13/2003 -0700, Phil wrote: > >> No, it wasn't blind testing, but it was fairly obvious that Nero was >> better >> because the same settings (normal or extreme) didn't have distortions >> like >> with Psytel. ------------------------------------------------------ ephPod Mailing List FAQ and HomePage http://www.ephpod.com mailto:[email protected] to susbcribe mailto:[email protected] to unsusbcribe mailto:[email protected] the mailing-list itself