Re: ispman-HEAD tasks cleanup
Paul Wolstenholme <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.isp.ispman.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Jan 5, 2005, at 12:38 PM, Jörg Delker wrote: > Wim Kerkhoff wrote: > >> Paul Wolstenholme wrote: >> >>> I'm quite new to ispman. I've only been using it for a few months. >>> The one major change I've made to my installation revolves around >>> using cyrus virtual domains. With this setup, the uid is the same >>> as their email address. The changes were not difficult to implement >>> -- most of the changes were to ldap templates, control panel, and >>> the creation of user directories. If people are interested, I do >>> not believe it would be difficult to implement this feature in a >>> way which would be compatible with the old model. >> >> >> Any idea what would be involved in migrating from uid's of the format >> user_domain_told to [email protected]? Currently I have both in LDAP so >> that users can authenticate either way through >> PAM/Perdition/SMTP/SSH/etc, except for Sieve - which is requiring >> user_domain_tld as per the mailboxes. > > The "old" format user_domain_tld is still (and probably always) needed > for LDAP NSS lookups for the OS. > So we have to find a way where both uids live happily together. > > Any suggestions/patches going in this direction are welcome and I > would be happy to test/apply those to the development. Any suggestions on the preferred kind of implementation: per deployment -- during installation of ispman you would select whether to use pam or not. This would determine how the uid is store. This would be pretty easy to implement: Add a new config variable and modify the application code and templates. It would be nice to write a migration script for those wishing to switch. per box -- some boxes use pam others don't. The directory would have to have both forms of uid. This would be a bit trickier to implement. I imagine some change might have to be made to the schema but I would have to check. > > Joerg > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > The SF.Net email is sponsored by: Beat the post-holiday blues > Get a FREE limited edition SourceForge.net t-shirt from ThinkGeek. > It's fun and FREE -- well, almost....http://www.thinkgeek.com/sfshirt > _______________________________________________ > Ispman-developers mailing list > Ispman-developers-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ispman-developers > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (Darwin) iD4DBQFB3y3U4vygjarL2QkRAucyAJ9cKc5R8lj1mBxOuTjSi9O6uPNHjgCYtkGV VrmS9QCukURqVQe9jtqkoA== =uGOb -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- ------------------------------------------------------- The SF.Net email is sponsored by: Beat the post-holiday blues Get a FREE limited edition SourceForge.net t-shirt from ThinkGeek. It's fun and FREE -- well, almost....http://www.thinkgeek.com/sfshirt