Re: ispman-HEAD tasks cleanup

Paul Wolstenholme <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.isp.ispman.devel
Message-ID <[email protected]>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1


On Jan 5, 2005, at 12:38 PM, Jörg Delker wrote:

> Wim Kerkhoff wrote:
>
>> Paul Wolstenholme wrote:
>>
>>> I'm quite new to ispman. I've only been using it for a few months. 
>>> The  one major change I've made to my installation revolves around 
>>> using  cyrus virtual domains. With this setup, the uid is the same 
>>> as their  email address. The changes were not difficult to implement 
>>> -- most of  the changes were to ldap templates, control panel, and 
>>> the creation of  user directories. If people are interested, I do 
>>> not believe it would  be difficult to implement this feature in a 
>>> way which would be  compatible with the old model.
>>
>>
>> Any idea what would be involved in migrating from uid's of the format 
>> user_domain_told to [email protected]? Currently I have both in LDAP so 
>> that users can authenticate either way through 
>> PAM/Perdition/SMTP/SSH/etc, except for Sieve - which is requiring 
>> user_domain_tld as per the mailboxes.
>
> The "old" format user_domain_tld is still (and probably always) needed 
> for LDAP NSS lookups for the OS.
> So we have to find a way where both uids live happily together.
>
> Any suggestions/patches going in this direction are welcome and I 
> would be happy to test/apply those to the development.

Any suggestions on the preferred kind of implementation:
per deployment -- during installation of ispman you would select 
whether to use pam or not. This would determine how the uid is store. 
This would be pretty easy to implement: Add a new config variable and 
modify the application code and templates. It would be nice to write a 
migration script for those wishing to switch.
per box -- some boxes use pam others don't. The directory would have to 
have both forms of uid. This would be a bit trickier to implement. I 
imagine some change might have to be made to the schema but I would 
have to check.




>
> Joerg
>
>
>
> -------------------------------------------------------
> The SF.Net email is sponsored by: Beat the post-holiday blues
> Get a FREE limited edition SourceForge.net t-shirt from ThinkGeek.
> It's fun and FREE -- well, almost....http://www.thinkgeek.com/sfshirt
> _______________________________________________
> Ispman-developers mailing list
> Ispman-developers-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ispman-developers
>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (Darwin)

iD4DBQFB3y3U4vygjarL2QkRAucyAJ9cKc5R8lj1mBxOuTjSi9O6uPNHjgCYtkGV
VrmS9QCukURqVQe9jtqkoA==
=uGOb
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----



-------------------------------------------------------
The SF.Net email is sponsored by: Beat the post-holiday blues
Get a FREE limited edition SourceForge.net t-shirt from ThinkGeek.
It's fun and FREE -- well, almost....http://www.thinkgeek.com/sfshirt
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.